Epstein Secrets

ee circuits had reached the opposite conclusion? GOVERNMENT'S RIGHT TO ASSERT ERROR DENIAL OF VICTIMS’ RIGHTS

this position appears to place the Department in violation of a binding court ruling that extends rights to thousands of crime victims in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. And more generally, the Depart- ment’s position simply has no grounding in the clear language of the CVRA. My first question: What is th

sonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government.” At least in the posture of this case (and we do

ing such an approach would be difficult.*” Presumably the Justice Department has already been providing such rights in at least Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi to comply with the Fifth 197 See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422(b), 2423(b), (e) (2012). 198 A more substantial summary of the case is available in case filings

t shined a spotlight on the Ethiopian drought and U.S. Government responded with over $800 million in aid. In 1999

ncert Hall in Los Angeles, California. Projects under construction include the Signature Theatre in New York City; the Ohr O’Keefe Museums in Biloxi, Mississippi; the Make it Right Foundation in New Orleans, Louisiana, the Puente de Vida Museum of Biodiversity in Panama; the Frederick R. Weisman Art Museum Exp

the district court in the Does case also rejected Government efforts to dismiss the action. The district court

ng such an approach would be difficult. 7° Presumably the Justice Department has already been providing such rights in at least Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi to comply with the Fifth [*95] Circuit's 2008 ruling in In Re Dean, which held that the CVRA extends rights to victims before defendants are charged