Epstein Secrets

:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 5 of 29 Jane Doe II v. Epstein. et al. Page 5 the principles articulated in Colorado River Water Consent. Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976) and Moses H. Cone Memorial Hosp. v. Mercury Constr.

th the federal courts. Furthermore, there is a presumption of concurrent jurisdiction of state courts. See generally, Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly, 494 U.S. 820, 823, 110 S.Ct. 1566, 1568-69 (1990). "Under our 'system of dual sovereignty, we have consistently held that state courts have inhere

entanyl Crisis Grows, U.S.-Mexico Divide Deepens • Six Law Enforcement Agencies Will Work Together to Fight Gun Crime in the Illinois Area • Former Colorado Officer Is The First To Be Convicted Of Failure To Intervene Under State Law INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS • Canada, U.S. To Expand Intelligence Sharing

The Daily Beast (04/28, Swezey), HuffPost (04/28, Vlachou), Washington Examiner (04/28, Goldsberry), Newswer (04/28, Cronin), Daily Express (04/28, Donnelly), and MSNBC (04/28, Video). EFTA00160422 As Special Counsel Nears Decision In Trump Cases, Who Are The Lawyers Working With Him ABC News (04/28,

N does not offer any evidence of any Congressional direction that would direct this Court to abstain for claims under 18 U.S.C. §2255.4 Further, the Colorado River doctrine only applies when federal courts are presented with "difficult questions of state 3The federal claims that are the subject matter of

th the federal courts. Furthermore, there is a presumption of concurrent jurisdiction of state courts. See generally, Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly, 494 U.S. 820, 823, 110 S.Ct. 1566, 1568-69 (1990). "Under our 'system of dual sovereignty, we have consistently held that state courts have inhere