Epstein Secrets

onment" and budgetary considerations, and not to any study on the effect of reentry placement on inmates.' Numerous states were affected, including Colorado, Kentucky, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Although the Bureau reported

ited in the DOJ Report. See DOJ Report at 38-39 nn.20-24. " See DOJ Report at 28 (discussing multiple algorithmic measures of racial bias). 15 See Melissa Hamilton, Debating Algorithmic Fairness, 52 UC DAVIS L REV. ONLINE 261 (2019); Jay P. Singh, Predictive Validi?Perfonnance Indicators in Violent Risk Assessm

onment" and budgetary considerations, and not to any study on the effect of reentry placement on inmates.' Numerous states were affected, including Colorado, Kentucky, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Although the Bureau reported

ited in the DOJ Report. See DOJ Report at 38-39 nn.20-24. " See DOJ Report at 28 (discussing multiple algorithmic measures of racial bias). 15 See Melissa Hamilton, Debating Algorithmic Fairness, 52 UC DAVIS L REV. ONLINE 261 (2019); Jay P. Singh, Predictive Validi?Perfonnance Indicators in Violent Risk Assessm

onment" and budgetary considerations, and not to any study on the effect of reentry placement on inmates.' Numerous states were affected, including Colorado, Kentucky, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Although the Bureau reported

ited in the DOJ Report. See DOJ Report at 38-39 nn.20-24. " See DOJ Report at 28 (discussing multiple algorithmic measures of racial bias). 15 See Melissa Hamilton, Debating Algorithmic Fairness, 52 UC DAVIS L REV. ONLINE 261 (2019); Jay P. Singh, Predictive Validi?Perfonnance Indicators in Violent Risk Assessm