Epstein Secrets

and Notification Act (SORNA), for failure to register after traveling in interstate commerce because his interstate travel-an unreported move from Oklahoma to Missouri-was completed prior to July 27, 2007, SORNA's effective date, and statute's plain language made it clear that it operated prospectively

late substantive due process. United States v Ambert (2009, CAI I Fla) 561 F3d 1202, 21 FLW Fed C 1596. Congress did not exceed its authority under Commerce Clause, U.S. Const. art. 1, § 8, cl. 3, when it passed 18 USCS§ 2250(a) because when sex offender traveled from one state to another, he was instrumentalit

od spanning from Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act 's enactment in July 2006 up to date defendant finally registered as sex offender in Oklahoma as required by state and federal law on January 24, 2007, defendant continued to travel in interstate commerce daily between Oklahoma and Arkansas f

sex offender when he crossed state lines because both statutes were constitutional; 18 USCS § 2250 was proper exercise of congressional power under Commerce Clause because Congress has broad federal power to regulate persons who cross state boundaries and, while 42 USCS § 16913 exceeded Congress's power under C

-calculate the defendant's sentence. I. The presentence report ("PSI") presented the following basic facts. During an investigation conducted in Oklahoma in May 2003, the FBI learned that Warren Paul Perkins, III, had emailed child pornography images to the America OnLine ("AOL") screen name "moonki

Act to defendant did not violate due process; and (3) enactment of PROTECT Act was a valid exercise of Congressional authority under the For- eign Commerce Clause. Affirmed. Ferguson, Circuit Judge, filed dissenting opinion. West Headnotes III Criminal Law 110 413=.18 110 Criminal Law 110I Nature and Elem