Epstein Secrets

lement agreement at trial under Fed. R. Evid. 403).3 And because plea negotiations, "if publicly released, could be damaging to reputation and 'See Wagner v. Wastiffs, Case No. 2:08-cv-431 (S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement

arm; [2] the precision with which the order is drawn; [3] the availability of a less onerous alternative; and [4] the duration of the order." In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). H. THERE IS GOOD CAUSE TO ISSUE THE PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Even though the Eleventh Circuit has rul

lement agreement at trial under Fed. R. Evid. 403).3 And because plea negotiations, "if publicly released, could be damaging to reputation and 3See Wagner" Wastiffs, Case No. 2:08-cv-431 (S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement on

arm; [2] the precision with which the order is drawn; [3] the availability of a less onerous alternative; and [4] the duration of the order." In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). H. THERE IS GOOD CAUSE TO ISSUE THE PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Even though the Eleventh Circuit has rul

t the dissemination and use of discovery concerning settlement discussions, even if the communications themselves are not privileged. See 3 But see Wagner v. Wastiffc, Case No. 2:08-cv-431 (S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEX1S 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement

harm; [2] the precision with which the order is drawn; [3] the availability of a less onerous alternative; and [4] the duration of the order.@ In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987). II. THERE IS GOOD CAUSE TO ISSUE THE PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Even though the Eleventh Circuit has r