Epstein Secrets

lement agreement at trial under Fed. R. Evid. 403).3 And because plea negotiations, "if publicly released, could be damaging to reputation and 'See Wagner v. Wastiffs, Case No. 2:08-cv-431 (S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement

andard of Rule 26(c) applies. Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1310 (11th Cir. 2001) ("The district court required Firestone to meet a compelling interest standard. To the extent this was predicated on a constitutional right of access, it was error"). a. Heightened Scrut

lement agreement at trial under Fed. R. Evid. 403).3 And because plea negotiations, "if publicly released, could be damaging to reputation and 3See Wagner" Wastiffs, Case No. 2:08-cv-431 (S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement on

andard of Rule 26(c) applies. Chicago Tribune Co. I. Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1310 (11th Cir. 2001) ("The district court required Firestone to meet a compelling interest standard. To the extent this was predicated on a constitutional right of access, it was error"). a. Heightened Scrut

t the dissemination and use of discovery concerning settlement discussions, even if the communications themselves are not privileged. See 3 But see Wagner v. Wastiffc, Case No. 2:08-cv-431 (S.D. Ohio May 14, 2013), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEX1S 68349 (denying motion to compel discovery of settlement agreement

ndard of Rule 26(c) applies. Chicago Tribune Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1310 (I I th Cir. 2001) (AThe district court required Firestone to meet a compelling interest standard. To the extent this was predicated on a constitutional right of access, it was error@). a. Heightened Scrut