Epstein Secrets

to provide any information at all. Counsel were then forced to request flight logs from Epstein's various private pilots. One of Epstein's pilots, David Rogers, provided certain flight logs covering some flights from a much broader time frame: 1997-2005. This production confirmed that the flight 32 See, e

Composite Exhibit 25 with Composite Exhibit 26 (Rodgers Logs). Other flights, such as the March 18, 2005

information Dershowitz provided to police was incomplete. A comparison of the flight manifests and logs confirms that the flight logs provided by Rogers were also incomplete. A cursory review of both logs reveals that together the logs produced cover only a small fraction of the flights taken and th

where sexual mores change over time, complicate the matter even further. See generally Richard A. Posner, Sex and Reason (1992). The history of the Mann Act confirms the caution with which the federal government should approach this entire area. For example, historically, the Act was used by some prosecu

t number of individuals to work at his residences, renovate those residences, or fly his private airplane. Some, like Juan Alessi, Lany Visoski, and David Rodgers, testified at trial. Still others were listed on the parties' witness lists. The Defendant does not explain why these witnesses' testimony, or the t

Some, like Juan Alessi, Lany Visoski, and David Rodgers, testified at trial. Still others were listed on

the Defendant argues that testimony resulted in the "ultimate prejudice" because it led to the jury improperly convicting her on three of the four Mann Act counts. Maxwell Br. at 18. For the same reasons noted above, the Defendant was not prejudiced by the Court's response to the jury note because the

the defendant's previous crimes of sexual assault and child molestation, demonstrating a propensity to commit such crimes. E.g., United States v. Rogers, 587 F.3d 816, 821 (7th Cir.2009). But like other evidence, such testimony is subject to the limitations that Rule 403 places on evidence O 2011 T

cit sexual conduct with another person shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both. Section 2421 is the original Mann Act, as amended in minor respects. Section 2423(a), inten- ded to protect minors from sexual predation, mir- rors the Mann Act but imposes more severe p