Epstein Secrets

TELEPHONE: F4c31;41LE: October 23, 2009 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler Fort Laude e, on a Dear Brad: I have obtained copies of David Rodgers' pilot logs from 1998-2002. I previously provided you with copies of Mr. Rodgers' logs for 2002-2005. As you know, these are Mr. Rodgers' personal d

r Fort Laude e, on a Dear Brad: I have obtained copies of David Rodgers' pilot logs from 1998-2002. I previously provided you with copies of Mr. Rodgers' logs for 2002-2005. As you know, these are Mr. Rodgers' personal documents. Pursuant to your agreement with Bob Critton about limiting the time pe

ovided you with copies of Mr. Rodgers' logs for 2002-2005. As you know, these are Mr. Rodgers' personal documents. Pursuant to your agreement with Bob Critton about limiting the time period covered by the subpoena, I am prepared to provide these documents to you, provided you agree to a stipulated protect

/0 Lg_S PASSENGERS Arrival Time Pilots: Dave Rodgers, Larry Vbeskl Plight Engineer: Larry Morrison

JEGE, INC. PASSENGER MANIFEST Registration Number N988JE Type: Tonal DATE: d- -3 2005 FROM Ttr in /0 Lg_S PASSENGERS Arrival Time Pilots: Dave Rodgers, Larry Vbeskl Plight Engineer: Larry Morrison cm* TO 70 ‘. -1- ;b6,--C; ) =Mr 3 /42 4. Coe 5. t,/b Mucieza 7. 8. 1-..44.14) ?

oe. 21 MR. LIINO: Adam Langino on behalf of 22 plaintiff, ■ 23 MS. EZELL: Cathy Ezell on behalf of Jane 24 Doe 101 and 102. 25 MR. CRITTON: Bob Critton on behalf of Page 13 1 Q. When was that? 2 A. I began on September of 2004. 3 Q. And where were you employed? 4 A. I work -- well, I have se

calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 19982-19985 09/03/2009 Jacquie Johnson Mike Fisten Dave Rogers depo Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

issible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045-02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 19982-19985 09/03/2009 Dave Rogers depo Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights from Bob Critton 02049-02053 09/04/2009 Doe v. Epstein — Letter Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to t

calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 19982-19985 09/03/2009 Jacquie Johnson Mike Fisten Dave Rogers depo Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

ble evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045.02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect