Epstein Secrets

to provide any information at all. Counsel were then forced to request flight logs from Epstein's various private pilots. One of Epstein's pilots, David Rogers, provided certain flight logs covering some flights from a much broader time frame: 1997-2005. This production confirmed that the flight 32 See, e

Composite Exhibit 25 with Composite Exhibit 26 (Rodgers Logs). Other flights, such as the March 18, 2005

information Dershowitz provided to police was incomplete. A comparison of the flight manifests and logs confirms that the flight logs provided by Rogers were also incomplete. A cursory review of both logs reveals that together the logs produced cover only a small fraction of the flights taken and th

ted that it possessed information contradicting Reinhart's sworn affidavit. See DE 225.1 at 9-10, ¶¶ 43-45 ("in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possess information that Reinhart leamed confidential non-public information about the Epstein case and he disc

Composite Exhibit 25 with Composite Exhibit 26 (Rodgers Logs). Other flights, such as the March 18, 2005

to provide any information at all. Counsel were then forced to request flight logs from Epstein's various private pilots. One of Epstci n's pilots. David Rogers, provided certain flight logs covering some flights from a much broader time frame: 1997-2005. This production confirmed that the flight 12 See, e

information Dershowitz provided to police was incomplete. A comparison of the flight manifests and logs confirms that the flight logs provided by Rogers were also incomplete. A cursory review of both logs reveals that together the logs produced cover only a small fraction of the flights taken and th

itted that it possessed information contradicting Reinhart's sworn affidavit. See DE 225-I at 9-10, 43-45 ("in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possess information that Reinhart learned confidential non-public information about the Epstein case and he dis

interest in any witness, subject, or t et of the E stein invests ation includin Ghislaine Maxwell, , Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visold, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs

ness address. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and that he di

lvement in and/or awareness of the Government's n witness, subject, or tar et of the Epstein i including )111%1;6 Maxwell, Larry Morrison, iso , David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs

iness address. However, I did not have any direct ■ of contradicting sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and that he di

areness of the Government's • • witness, subject, or t ' investigation, includin Ghislaine Maxwell, Lesley Groff, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (including telephone log

ss. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting Reinhart's sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that Reinhart learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and th