Epstein Secrets

may prove to be an essential piece of evidence. The logs are voluminous, spanning thousands of flights between 1995 and 2013. The logs were kept by David Rodgers, just one of at least six pilots employed by Epstein at various times, court documents show. The other pilots included according to a statement of

tween 1995 and 2013. The logs were kept by David Rodgers, just one of at least six pilots employed by Epst

e winter that prisoners report having trouble thinking and wearing layers of clothes to be able to sleep. A single psychiatrist serves both MCC and the Metropolitan Detention Center, another federal facility located in Brooklyn. People report being "treated" through the slat in their cell door. The facility is run down, and the

may prove to be an essential piece of evidence. The logs are voluminous, spanning thousands of flights between 1995 and 2013. The logs were kept by David Rodgers, just one of at least six pilots employed by Epstein at various times, court documents show. The other pilots included according to a statement of

Maxwell. In that suit, a eges pstern ent er out as a minor for sex with his friends. Logs from the other pilots have not surfaced in court records. Rodgers and Visoski were subpoenaed by federal prosecutors in Manhattan shortly after Epstein's arrest in July, The New York Times reported, and both pilots

e winter that prisoners report having trouble thinking and wearing layers of clothes to be able to sleep. A single psychiatrist serves both MCC and the Metropolitan Detention Center, another federal facility located in Brooklyn. People report being "treated" through the slat in their cell door. The facility is run down, and the

granting the Defendant's third bail motion while Defendant's bail appeal is pending. See Gov't Opp'n at 2-3; Reply at 2-3; see also United States v. Rodgers, 101 F.3d 247, 251 (2d Cir. 1996) ("As a general matter, 'the filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance— it confers ju

the Defendant was a flight risk and that detention without bail was warranted under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(1). The Defendant has been incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center since that time. The Defendant renewed her motion for release on bail on December 8, 2020. The Court again denied the Defendant's motion. In doing

ction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.' United States v. Rodgers, 101 F.3d 247, 251 (2d Cir. 1996) (quoting Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982)). "The divestiture of jurisdiction rule .

the Defendant was a flight risk and that detention without bail was warranted under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(1). The Defendant has been incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center since that time. The Defendant renewed her motion for release on bail on December 8, 2020. The Court again denied the Defendant's motion. In doing