Epstein Secrets

ood. Developmental Review, 24, 101-132. Pezdek, K., Morrow, A., Blandon-Gitlin, I., Goodman, G. S., Quas, J., Saywitz, K., Bidrose, S., Pipe, M-E., Rogers, M., & Brodie, L. (2004). Detecting deception in children: The effect of event familiarity on Criterion Based Content Analysis ratings. Journal of A

(Eds), Emotion and memory (pp. 233-257). London: Blackwell Press. Goodman, G. S., Myers, J. E. B., Qin, J., Quas, J. A., Castelli, P., Redlich, A., & Rogers, L (2006). Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 363-4

595-613. Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: A modern history and contemporary commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 811-832. Malloy, L., Mitchell, E., Block, S., Quas, J., & Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: Balancing children's needs and defendants' rights whe

rt in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated- ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v

ne of the Fifth Amendment's "basic functions . . . is to protect innocent men . . . 'who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances."); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

t in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated - ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v

iguous Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 63 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 6 of 37 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page6 circumstances."); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated — ... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v

. One of the Fifth Amendment's "basic functions ... is to protect innocent men ... 'who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances."); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process 7 EFTA00234827

595-613. Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: A modem history and contemporary commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 811-832. Malloy, L., Mitchell, E., Block, S., Quas, J., Sr Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: Balancing children's needs and defendants' rights wh

ychology-Law Society meetings, Hilton Head, SC. 44 EFTA00018341 --- PAGE BREAK --- Goodman, G. S., Myers, J., Qin, J. J., Quas, J., Schuder, M., Rogers, L., & Redlich, A. (1996, February). Should interviews of children be videotaped or adults testify in children's place?: Effects of hearsay on juro