Epstein Secrets

0), 718-723; Sigmund, K., Hauert, C., & Nowak, M. (2001). Reward and punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 989), 10757- 10762; Trivers, R.L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57. Quotes Watts, D. P., Muller, M., Amsler, S. J., Mbabazi

so. These ideas started with Charles Darwin. One hundred years later, they were developed in exquisite detail by the American evolutionary biologist Robert Trivers. Combined, they provide an explanation for why, in most species including our own, males compete with each other for access to females — the most val

nard Smith, J. & Harper, D. (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press; Searcy, W.A. & Nowicki, S. (2010). The Evolution of Animal Communication. Princeton University Press; Zahavi, A. & Zahavi, A. (1999). The Handicap Principle. Oxford University Press. * An elite group of killers: Beckerman, S., Erickson, P., Yost, J.

the long run. Am. Nat. 181.451-463. Taylor. P.D.. Jon ker. L. 1978. Evolutionarily stable strategies and game dynamics. Math. Biosa. 40. 145-156. Trivers. R.L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart. Rev. Biol. 46. 35-57. Tucker.A.. 1950.A tyro-person dilemma. In: Rasmussen. E. (Ed.). Read

utionary force. Am. Nat. 91. 105-110. Schecter. S.. Gintis. H.. 2016. Game Theory in Action: An Introduction to Classical and Evolutionary Models. Princeton University Press. Princeton. New Jersey. Schuster. P.. Sigmund. IC. 1983. Replicator dynamics. J. Theor. Biology 100.533-538. Slcyrms. B.. 2004. The Stag Hunt and E

London: Yale University Press. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. Trivers, Robert. 1985. Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings. Wright, Robert. 2000. Non-Zero: The Logic of Human Destiny. New York: Pantheon.

rs. New York: Ballantine Books. Axelrod, Robert. 1997. Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Cooperation. Princeton, NJ; Princeton University Press. Axelrod, Robert, and Michael D. Cohen. 2001. Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. New York: Free Press. B

y intensity. B. Math. Biol. 70, 1410-1424. [158] Trivers, R.L., 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism

ability of evolutionary stable strategies in small populations. Ecol. Model. 109, 283-294. [33] Frank, S.A., 1998. Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. [34] Fu, F., Wang, L., Nowak, M.A., Hauert C., 2008. Evolutionary Dynamics on Graphs: Efficent Method for Weak Selection. To be pu

ly applied in biological contexts to explain phenomena such as animal sex ratios (Fisher, 1958), territoriality (Smith & Price, 1973), coop- eration (Trivers, 1971), sexual displays (Zahavi, 1975), and parent—offspring con- flict (Trivers, 1974). More recently, evolutionary dynamic models have been applied

iving vs. giving in. Yale University Working Paper. Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Chammah, A. M., & Rapoport, A. (1965). Prisoner’s dilemma; a study in conflict and coopera- tion. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Chwe, M.

-- References 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 R. L. Trivers, Quarterly review of biology pp. 35-57 (1971). J.

A. Nowak, science 314, 1560 (2006). H. Ohtsuki, Y. Iwasa, Journal of Theoretical Biology 239, 435 (2006). K. Sigmund, The calculus of selfishness (Princeton University Press, 2010). M. J. Osborne, An introduction to game theory (Oxford University Press, USA, 2003). P. D. Taylor, L. B. Jonker, Mathematical biosciences 40