Epstein Secrets

no, W Graham, is Johnson, sh Marcus, E Naranjo, a S Perez. C Plpkin, L Rivera, c Albanese, P Clarke. d $ Covington, T Davis, C Durent.1S Ferguson, S Groin. r $ Kearins, M Matthews. A Noellen, Y Perim. A Reyes. d $ Rodriguez, C Royal, V Shivers, k $ Mart J Sehu0Pel. c S Silva, W Vuo

s to hospital morgue area cooling unit 1050 Area is ensured as secure by officers on detail at direction of IDO 1135 IDO communicates with Director Wiggins of Office of City Medical Examiner (OCME) in regards to receiving remains to he transported to city morgue 1137 A/W notified by 100 1138 !DO attem

no, W Graham, is Johnson, fis Marcus, E Naranjo, a S Perez. C Plpkin, L Rivera, c Albanese, P Clarke. d Covington, T Davis, C Durant.1 $ Ferguson, S Gnialva. r $ Kearins, M Matthews, A Noelien, Y Perim. A Reyes. d Rodriguez, C Royal, V Shivers, k $ Vim, J SehuOPei c $ Silva, W Vuon

IDO receives communication from AM I208 MO receives communication from A/W in regards to instruction on remains 1210 IDO communicates with Director Wiggins of OCME and coordinate movement 1257 Staff from OCME depart from New York Presbyterian hospital and transport remains to city morgue location 1303

e law of this Circuit. See United States v. Joseph, 542 F.3d 13, 21-22 (2d Cir. 2008), abrogated on other grounds as recognized by United States v. Ferguson, 676 F.3d 260, 276 n.14 (2d Cir. 2011) (recognizing that social science research "cannot have the exactness of hard science methodologies, and expe

ion had clear independent reliability because Minor Victim-4 stated that she knew the defendant by name from previous interactions. For example, in Wiggins v. Greiner, the Second Circuit declined to address a disputed question about a confirmatory identification's suggestiveness because the independent