Epstein Secrets

Many. It was senators. It was Senator 13 met him. 14 Mitchell. George Mitchell. It was Prince Andrew. It 14 Q. Were Prince Andrew and Princess Sarah friends 15 was Princess Sarah. 15 of Ms. Maxwell? 16 Q. Princess? 16 A. Both of them. 17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 17 Q. Both Ms. Max

Sarah. 15 of Ms. Maxwell? 16 Q. Princess? 16 A. Both of them. 17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 17 Q. Both Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein? 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 18 A. Yeah. 19 A. Ferguson. 19 Q. Did -- did they ever have massages when they 20 And it was a couple Misses. Misses Yugoslavia. 20 were t

. Both Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein? 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 18 A. Yeah. 19 A. Ferguson. 19 Q. Did -- d

at time used to take care Page 6 Page 8 1 MS. EZELL: Katherine Ezell from Podhurst 1 of a lot of residents in Palm Beach. And I got to know 2 Orseck, on behalf of Jane Does 101 and 102. 2 Jeffrey through Lesley Wexner. And I used to work in 3 MR. CRITTON: Bob Critton. on behalf of 3 about 20

Q. Who did you see at house? 13 A. Many. It was senators. It was Senator 14 Mitchell. George Mitchell. It was Prince Andrew. It 15 was Princess Sarah. 16 Q. Princess? 17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 19 A. Ferguson. 20 And it was a couple Misses. Misses Yugoslavia,

s Senator 14 Mitchell. George Mitchell. It was Prince Andrew. It 15 was Princess Sarah. 16 Q. Princess? 17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 19 A. Ferguson. 20 And it was a couple Misses. Misses Yugoslavia, 21 Miss Germany that I don't even know the names. But they 22 were a lot o

17 A. Sarah. the wife of Andrew. 18 Q. Sarah Ferguson? 19 A. Ferguson. 20 And it was a couple Misse

y -- A. No. Q. -- or an ad in the paper? A. I had a company at that time used to take care Page 6 1 MS. EZELL: Katherine Ezell from Podhurst 2 Orseck, on behalf of Jane Does 101 and 102. 3 MR. CRITTON: Bob Griffon, on behalf of 4 Jeffrey Epstein. 5 THEREUPON, 6 JUAN ALESSI, 7 having been

encompasses any deviation from the Board's recommendation, including the People's discretion to recommend a lower risk level. See, e.g., People v. Ferguson, 53 A.D.3d 571, 572 (2d Dep't 2008) (holding that 10- day notice requirement applies not only to changes in RAI scoring, but to changes in factual p

opposition 27:24 option 7:23 order 6:1612:14 22:21 30:23,24 33:17,17 36:19 44:15 ordinarily 26:3 34:12 ordinary 27:10 39:13 originally 6:5 Orseck 2:2,5 3:17 other 7:1,17 16:4,5 17:22 22:13,18 23:6,21,2224:1 25:21 26:8 32:8 34:9,11 36:12 42:18 43:8 44:10 otherwise 39:14 out 8:8 10:16 22: