Epstein Secrets

d 1038 (5th Cir. 1972). [FN17] U.S.—Packard 1 Banton, 264 U.S. 140, 44 S. Ct. 257, 68 L. Ed. 596 (1924). [FN18] Fla.—Gulf Theatres'. State ex rel. Ferguson, 133 Fla. 634, 182 So. 842 (1938). [FN191 U.S. Hartirader 1. Wadley, 172 U.S. 148, 19 S. Ct. 119, 43 L. Ed. 399 (1898). [FN20] Fla.—Coleman Greene

dinance on which the prosecution is based may be deter- mined as readily in the crimin as in a suit for an i nction. & Farnum Mfg. Co. [City of Angeles, 189 U.S. [23 S.Ct 498, 47 L.Ed. 778) ; Fenner v. Boykin, 271 U.S. 240 [46 S.Ct. 492, 70 L.Ed. 927]. Where the threatened prosecution is by stat

:14 Fe 280:8,12 feel 219:19 291:3 feeling 256:10 feet 287:19,21 305:12,15 307:8,9,15 Fekkai 274:23 felt 219:5 267:12,13,15 female 267:22 fence 313:25 Ferguson 266:20 few 239:1,2 243:17,18 253:25 259:19 fill 258:3 finance 228:24 252:25 financed 225:11 226:19 financial 220:16 224:10 226:13 283:11 financially

280:2 281:24 282:17 287:22 288:2 293:14 294:9,20 299:7 301:19 304:9 308:23,25 310:11 312:7 327:21 analysis 314:6 anchor 238:20,20 Andrew 238:5 239:5 Angeles 258:19 angle 277:5 announced 294:16 annoying 264:4 311:17 another 227:8 233:18 236:10 238:5 246:7 271:21 272:14 276:10 299:10 answer 223:8 231:16 238

on.” 4 The prince’s ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, while on a skiing trip with the prince and their

berts, Buckingham | ay. “The allegations made are false Some few months before it was taken, a reporter posing as a " businessman had secretly taped Sarah Ferguson’s demand for | five hundred thousand pounds in return for access to the prince. _ “If you want to meet him in your business,” she'd said then, ‘look af

om the duchess. Some of the behavior of the duchess is inconsistent with being mar- ried to, or an ex-wife of, the duke, There’s no question but that Sarah’s been a financially self-destructive element in the -duke’s life.” “The same kind of loyalty manifested itself last December, when the duke visited