Epstein Secrets

d continued the prosecution of those civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. When the RRA law firm imploded, Edwards joined in forming the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman ("Farmer Jaffe"), and continued prosecuting those cases. Days after the destruction of RRA, Jeffrey Epstein, f

a clear review of documents that Fowler White knew it was not permitted to have in its possession. Perhaps more compelling, Mr. Hurley's review of Fowler White's internal records indicated that in 2014, Fowler White created an inventory of the items in its possession relating to Jeffrey Epstein when Fowler W

s no longer voluntarily willing to pay for the service. While Farmer Jaffe's motion was pending, Special Master Carney contacted Farmer Jaffe about Fowler White's offer to copy and Bates stamp the documents in-house to save Epstein costs. Special Master Camey recommended that Fowler White's offer be accepted

ntaining information derived from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards. MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which

EAD EFTA00804173 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 declaration states that as part of Fowler White's representation of you, that they represented you in proceedings in the bankruptcy case concerning a subpoena that your original counsel issued to

19/18 Page 69 of 97 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Whic

received select documents from the disc in February 2018. The select documents were provided to Epstein after Link & Rockenbach located the disc in Fowler White's boxes in February 2018. Because there are no material facts in dispute, live testimony will have no impact on this Court's determination of whether

PA ("Link & Rockenbach"), which occurred on October 13, 2018. Due to the impermissible questions, Epstein additionally moves this Court to require Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. ("Farmer Jaffe"), Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and Intervenor L.M. ("L.M.") (collectively, the "Movants

hat request. (D.E. 6325; D.E. 6345.) Movants allege that Fowler White EFTA00794256 and Epstein violated this Court's November 2010 Agreed Order by Fowler White's alleged retention of a copy of a disc that was provided to Epstein and his current counsel (Link & Rockenbach) in 2018. (D.E. 6326 at 6-11.) The No

2/18 Page 73 of 165 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Whic

of your declaration, Exhibit Number 1, states, "In February 2018, Scott J. Link of Link & Rockenbach, PA, informed me that he had located a disc in Fowler White's files labeled," quote, Epstein Bate Stamp, unquote. Did I read that accurately? A: Correct. Q: That was a communication from Mr. Link, your lawyer