Epstein Secrets

secure mode of communication and may be accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is pri

each, FL 33401 Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. The L•S Law Firm Four Seasons Tower, 15th Floor 1441 Brickell Avenue Miami, FL 33131 Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue,

such, when a party fails to comply with a pretrial order, a court has broad discretion in determining sanctions. First Republic Corp. of America v. Hayes, 431 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, Defendant Edwards' inapposite and patent disregard for this Court's Order mandates sanctions. Fina

Second (FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 5 EFTA00793363 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. .-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J.

ase law." Thigpen v. United Parcel Servs., Inc., 990 So. 2d 639, 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing Johnson v. State, 863 So. 2d 271, 278 (Fla. 2003)); Hayes v. Wal- Man Stores, Inc., 933 So. 2d 124, 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); DeVille v. State, 917 So. 2d 1058, 1059 (Fla. 4`h DCA 2006); Dixon v. State, 911

tale, Jr., Esq. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mails: [email protected]; and [email protected] Primary E-Mail: [email protected] Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9451 Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards

on-compliance with orders of the Court constitutes civil contempt if the party has not in good faith made all reasonable efforts to comply. U.S. v. Hayes. 722 F.2d 723, 725 (11th Cir. 1984). However, "if the court finds the defendant acted willfully or maliciously in disregarding the injunction, then