Epstein Secrets

, which includes your legal ethics opinion that David Boies should be disqualified from representing Ms. in that matter. As you are aware, both Mr. Boles and Ms. were invited to testify at the August 27, 2019 hearing. I remain surprised that your advocacy of Mr. Boles' disqualification from represen

alification from representing Ms. Guiffre (in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Tum the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would f

9, which includes your legal ethics opinion that David Boies should be di ualified from representing Ms. in that matter. As you are aware, both Mr. Boles and Ms. were invited to testify at the August 27, 2019 hearing. ain surprised that your advocacy of Mr. Boles' disqualification from representing

ualification from representing Ms.. Lirint(in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Turn the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would

2019, which includes your legal ethics opinion that David Boies should be disqualified from representing- in that matter. As you are aware, both Mr. Boles and were invited to testify at the August 27, 2019 hearing. I remain surprised that your advocacy of Mr. Boles' disqualification from representing

Boles' disqualification from representing (in a case obviously related to US v. Epstein) was not disclosed simultaneously with your August 26, 2019 Law Journal opinion piece entitled "The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Turn the Dismissal Into a Drama for the Victims." I am also surprised that you would