Epstein Secrets

with resolving the case against Epstein. In November and December 2006, subpoenas were served on two other Epstein employees — Janusz Banasiak and Mucinska. Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, Mr. Banasiak was satisfied with I standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Muc

ile the letter covered all of these topics, I recall the meeting was focused primarily on challenges to the victims' credibility (e.g., one victim's MySpace page showed her smoking marijuana and posing provocatively); allegations of police overreaching; and the lack of evidence that Epstein knew the vic

asiak Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, r. anasi was satisfied with a standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Mucinska's attorney was insistent on formal immunity, and as noted above, so was Individual #28. I don't believe that, prior to this investigation, I had ev

ile the letter covered all of these topics, I recall the meeting was focused primarily on challenges to the victims' credibility (e.g., one victim's MySpace page showed her smoking marijuana and posing provocatively); allegations of police overreaching; and the lack of evidence that Epstein knew the vic

with Epstein's girlfriend as a birthday "gift" to Epstein. Neither is attention paid in the Probable Cause Affidavits of the fact that maintained a MySpace webpage in which she admitted to various criminal and dishonest acts, including creating false references for her work and her extensive drug use.'

Kellen 07/26/17 Page 2293 Public Records Request No.: 17-295 Dana Burns Tatiana 8/18 New Jersey Florida Jeffrey Epstein Adrian Mucinska Mr. Mucinska Mrs. Mucinska Adriana's Sister Nadia Marcinkova 8/22 TRAINING 8/22 Florida New Jersey Jeffrey Epstein Nadia Marcinkova 8/27 WINDSHIELD HE