Epstein Secrets

-10475-LGS-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/12/19 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN, and GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendants. COMPLAINT

OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the

N DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities

N DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities

rder in the criminal matter against him because it was required by law to do so after Epstein was deceased. On August 29, 2019, U.S. District Judge Richard Berman formally dismissed SDNY's indictment against Epstein, terminating the criminal action against him. C. 41. was born on parents divorced when she

ocument 1 Filed 11/14/19 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE 1000, Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and in their capacities as the execuorl. ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN, Defendants. COMPLAINT BOIES $CHILLER FLEXNER LLP 1 EFTA00099176 C

NE DOE 1000, Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and in their capacities as the execuorl. ESTATE

W YORK JANE DOE 1000, Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and in their capacities as the execuorl.

W YORK JANE DOE 1000, Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and in their capacities as the execuorl.

rder in the criminal matter against him because it was required by law to do so after Epstein was deceased. On August 29, 2019, U.S. District Judge Richard Berman formally dismissed SDNY's indictment against Epstein, terminating the criminal action against him. Plaintiff's claims are therefore timely under N.

9-cv-10475-LGS Document 1 Filed 11/12/19 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN, and GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendants. COMPLAINT

OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the

N DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities

N DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities

rder in the criminal matter against him because it was required by law to do so after Epstein was deceased. On August 29, 2019, U.S. District Judge Richard Berman formally dismissed SDNY's indictment against Epstein, terminating the criminal action against him. C. 41. was born on Ms parents divorced when

-10475-LGS-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/12/19 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, i in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN, and GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendants. COMPLAINT

T OF NEW YORK Plaintiff CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, i in their capacities as the

RN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, i in their capacitie

RN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, i in their capacities

rder in the criminal matter against him because it was required by law to do so after Epstein was deceased. On August 29, 2019, U.S. District Judge Richard Berman formally dismissed SDNY's indictment against Epstein, terminating the criminal action against him. to the New York mansion. Maxwell told that thes

ic told Bloomberg in a statement. Nikolic is listed as a "successor executor" of Epstein's estate should the executors, longtime Epstein employees Darren Indyke and be unable to fulfill their roles. The extent of Epstein and Nikolic's relationship isn't clear, but a source told Bloomberg that Nikolic funded

the executors, longtime Epstein employees Darren Indyke and be unable to fulfill their roles. The exten

should the executors, longtime Epstein employees Darren Indyke and be unable to fulfill their roles. Th

y report. With no one left in the case to prosecute, the federal prosecutors must request that the indictment against Epstein be dismissed by Judge Richard Berman. But the U.S. attorney assured in a letter to the judge that his office "remains committed to doing its utmost to stand up for the victims who have

should the executors, longtime Epstein employees Darren Indyke anc e unable to fulfill their roles. The extent

the executors, longtime Epstein employees Darren Indyke anc e unable to fulfill their roles. The extent

should the executors, longtime Epstein employees Darren Indyke anc e unable to fulfill their roles. The

y report. With no one left in the case to prosecute, the federal prosecutors must request that the indictment against Epstein be dismissed by Judge Richard Berman. But the U.S. attorney assured in a letter to the judge that his office "remains committed to doing its utmost to stand up for the victims who have

ocument 1 Filed 11/14/19 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE 1000, Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN, Defendants. COMPLAINT BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER

W YORK JANE DOE 1000, Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities

for her Complaint against Defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as the ex

rder in the criminal matter against him because it was required by law to do so after Epstein was deceased. On August 29, 2019, U.S. District Judge Richard Berman formally dismissed SDNY's indictment against Epstein, terminating the criminal action against him. Plaintiff's claims are therefore timely under N.