Epstein Secrets

tay Proceedings 20-cv-484 (JGK-DCF), Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et aL Dear Judge Freeman: On behalf of

Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: Letter Motion to Stay Proceedings 20-cv-484 (JGK-DCF), Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et aL Dear Judge Freeman: On behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, I write to Move to Stay proceedings in this matter until the conclusion of he

tein co-conspirators and on that plaintiff's stated intent to participate in the Voluntary Claims Resolution Program in the U.S. Virgin Islands. v. Indyke, 19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF, Doc. # 68 (May 13, 2020). Plaintiff opposed the request; her counsel claimed that Ms. Maxwell had not provided sufficient in

On June 29, 2020, before she had the opportunity to answer, Ms. Maxwell was indicted by a grand jury. That criminal case is now pending before Judge Nathan, United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN). The July 8 Superseding Indictment is attached as Exhibit A ("Indictment"). Notably, the Indictment quot

r 24, 2021 VIA ECF Hon. John G. Koeltl Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Doe v. Indyke, et al., 1:20-cv-000484-JGK-DCF Dear Judge Koeltl: Plaintiff Jane Doe hereby responds to the letter submitted by Ms. Maxwell's defense c

ther, it is Plaintiff’s understanding that Ms. Maxwell’s Rule 17(c) subpoena issued to the EVCP for the settlement release has been granted by Judge Nathan. Accordingly, the matter currently before this Court is moot. In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court deny Ms.

the Docket September 4, 2020 of Case No. 20cv00484. Dated: 09/09/2020 SO ORDERED DEBRA FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge Re: Jane Doe v. Darren It Indyke, et aL, 20 Civ. 484 (DCF) (JGK) Dear Judge Freeman: The Government respectfully submits this letter to request that the Court: (1) permit the Gove

ates Magistrate Judge Re: Jane Doe v. Darren It Indyke, et aL, 20 Civ. 484 (DCF) (JGK) Dear Judge Freem

nal case."). Finally, the Government notes that Maxwell's access to information about the criminal matter is under the jurisdiction of the Honorable Alison J. Nathan, who has entered a protective order and has issued several rulings regarding the scope of discovery that Maxwell is 3 In an August 25, 2020 opinion

s entered a protective order and has issued several rulings regarding the scope of discovery that Maxwell is 3 In an August 25, 2020 opinion, Judge Nathan held that Maxwell is not entitled to know who the Government's trial witnesses are at this stage of the criminal case. United States v. Ghislaine M

sed as related have now all been reassigned to the same magistrate judge, including: VE v. Nine East 71st Street et al., No. 19-cv-07625 (S.D.N.Y.) (Nathan, J.); Doe 1 el al. EFTA00028472 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:19-cv-08673-KPF Document 21 Filed 11/06/19 Page 2 of 2 KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP 2 As

e v. Darren K. Indyke et at, No. 19-ov-0777i (S.D.N.Y.) (Castel, .I.); Doe v. Darren K Indyke et at, No. 19-cv-07772 (S.D.N.Y.) (Carter, J.); Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et at, No. I9-cv-07773 (S.D.N.Y.) (Ramos, J.); and Doe 17 v. Indyke et at, No. I 9-cv-9610 (S.D.N.Y.) (Engelmayer, J.). EFTA00028473

Darren K Indyke et at, No. 19-cv-07772 (S.D.N.Y.) (Carter, J.); Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et at, No. I9-cv-07773 (S.D.N.Y.) (Ramos, J.); and Doe 17 v. Indyke et at, No. I 9-cv-9610 (S.D.N.Y.) (Engelmayer, J.). EFTA00028473

, No. 19-cv-07675 (S.D.N.Y) (Daniels, J.); Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et at, No. 19-ov-0777i (S.D.N.Y.) (Castel