Epstein Secrets

F Document 118 Filed 02/10/21 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) -against- DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as executor : of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein, et al., Defendants. LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: X OPINION AND O

ndants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their official capacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") (Indyke and Kahn together, the "Co-Executors"). The Complaint alleges claims of battery, false imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional distres

RK X Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) -against- DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as executor : of the Es

RK X Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) -against- DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as executor : of the Est

r a court order provides otherwise, costs -- other than attorney's fees -- should be allowed to the prevailing party."); see Carter v. Inc. Vii/. of Ocean Beach, 759 F.3d 159, 165 (2d Cir. 2014) ("A voluntary dismissal of an action with prejudice works [a material alteration of the legal relationship of the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------X JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, an individual, Defendants.

and Order, DE 118; accord Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et. al, Case No. 20-cv-484 (JGK), DE 98 at 5 (ad

------------------X JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities

is a prevailing party, or alternatively, that a district court has discretion to award costs to the defendant.”); see also Carter v. Inc. Vill. of Ocean Beach, 759 F.3d 159, 165 (2d Cir. 2014) (disclaiming prior Second Circuit dicta which stated that “generally the defendant is not considered the prevailin

F Document 118 Filed 02/10/21 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) -against- DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as executor : of the Estate ofJeffkey Edward Epstein, et al., Defendants. LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: X OPINION AND OR

ndants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their official capacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") (Indyke and Kahn together, the "Co-Executors"). The Complaint alleges claims of battery, false imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional distres

RK X Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) -against- DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as executor : of the Est

or' court order provides otherwise, costs -- other than attorney's fees -- should be allowed to the prevailing party."); see Carter v. Inc. VIII of Ocean Beach, 759 F.3d 159, 165 (2d Cir. 2014) (", voluntary dismissal of an action with prejudice works [I material alteration of the legal relationship of the