Epstein Secrets

ited States District Court Southern District of New York Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jefferey E. Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Dear Jud

t New York, NY 10007 Re: Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as exec

earl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities a

875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 troutman.com Bennet J. Moskowitz [email protected] March 12, 2021 VIA ECF The Honorable John G. Koeltl United States District Court Southern District of New York Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Jane Doe

d Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jefferey E. Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Dear Judge Koeltl: We represent Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jefferey E. Epstein (the “Co-Executors”), in the ab

ell for being fatherless and from a struggling family, in much the same manner as many of the other alleged victims.E83) Maxwell v Epstein's Estate, Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, and NES LLC (2020) On 12 March 2020, Maxwell filed a lawsuit in Superior Court in the US Virgin Islands seeking compensation from

ictims.E83) Maxwell v Epstein's Estate, Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, and NES LLC (2020) On 12 March

alleged victims.E83) Maxwell v Epstein's Estate, Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, and NES LLC (2020) On

alleged victims.E83) Maxwell v Epstein's Estate, Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, and NES LLC (2020) On 1

xwell has a history of b ii tachable during legal proceedings.[81][98][9O100] During the lawsuit filed in 2017 from against Maxwell, District Judge John G. Koeltl granted a motion for "alternative service" on the grounds that the plaintiffs efforts to reach Maxwell were persistently thwarted; these included h

From: Lesley Groff To: Darren Indyke -MIla> Subject: Individual Practices of Judge John G. Koeltl Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:24:38 +0000 Attachments: Scan_178.pdf; Scan_179.pdf; Scan_1

From: Lesley Groff To: Darren Indyke -MIla> Subject: Individual Practices of Judge Jo

From: Lesley Groff To: Darren Indyke -MIla> Subject: Individual Practices of J

From: Lesley Groff To: Darren Indyke -MIla> Subject: Individual Practices of Judge John G. Koeltl Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:24:38 +0000 Attachments: Scan_178.pdf; Scan_179.pdf; Scan_180.pdf; Scan_181.pdf; Scan_182.pdf; Scan_183.pdf EFTA00446651

: Darren Indyke Subject: Re: Summons (again) Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 14:47:44 +0000 Ok. Will do Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 7, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Darren Indyke n > wrote: > • We do need the entire doc to make sure they gave you everything and see exactly the complaint they gave you. > Sent from my iPhone

From: Lesley Groff <MINII > To: Darren Indyke Subject: Re: Summons (again) Date: Tue, 07 Mar

From: Lesley Groff <MINII > To: Darren Indyke Subject: Re: Summons (again) Date: Tue,

part is the entire complaint. The third part is titled: Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions. The Fourth part: Individual Practices of Judge John G. Koeltl. Not sure you need me to scan and email all of that? >> >> (sorry, I was at a Basktball Banquet from 6-9:30pm! ugh.... ) EFTA00446643

r 24, 2021 VIA ECF Hon. John G. Koeltl Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Doe v. Indyke, et al., 1:20-cv-000484-JGK-DCF Dear Judge Koeltl: Plaintiff Jane Doe hereby responds to the letter submitted by Ms. Maxwell's defense c

ca Boulevard, Suite 700 • Los Angeles, California 90025 • 310.477.1700 phone • 310.477.1699 fax • www.psblaw.com November 24, 2021 VIA ECF Hon. John G. Koeltl Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Doe v. Indyke, et al., 1:20-cv-000484-JGK-DCF

ck Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Doe v. Indyke, et al., 1:20-cv-000484-JGK-DCF Dear Judge Koeltl: Plaintiff Jane Doe hereby responds to the letter submitted by Ms. Maxwell's defense counsel on November 22, 2021 seeking authorization from th

Mil igirVr4-Jnialentii.4 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE Plaintiff, - against - DARREN K. INDYKE, ET AL. Defendants. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC# DATE FILED: 1,21/, ..:19j 20 cv 484 (JGK) ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Ju

T OF NEW YORK JANE DOE Plaintiff, - against - DARREN K. INDYKE, ET AL. Defendants. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT

the prevailing party, the plaintiff should pay the costs in the amount of $13.70. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York June 16, 2021 a (1 John G. Koeltl United States District Judge EFTA00011496

n Program Attached as Exhibit E 8. General Release, Epstein Victims' Compensation Program Not attached — pending release by Judge Koeltl in Doe v. Indyke, 20 Civ. 484 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. 2020) 9. Floorplans, Palm Beach residence SDNY GM 00328519-00328521 10. Palm Beach Police Department incident report

tims' Compensation Program Attached as Exhibit E 8. General Release, Epstein Victims' Compensation Program Not attached — pending release by Judge Koeltl in Doe v. Indyke, 20 Civ. 484 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. 2020) 9. Floorplans, Palm Beach residence SDNY GM 00328519-00328521 10. Palm Beach Police Departmen

ached — pending release by Judge Koeltl in Doe v. Indyke, 20 Civ. 484 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. 2020) 9. Floorplan

ims' Compensation Program Attached as Exhibit E 8. General Release, Epstein Victims' Compensation Program — Not attached — pending release by Judge Koeltl in Doe v. Indyke, 20 Civ. 484 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. 2020) 9. Floorplans, Palm Beach residence SDNY GM 00328519-00328521 10. Palm Beach Police Departmen

0484-JGK-DCF Document 98 Filed 03/08/21 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE, Plaintiff, - against - DARREN K. INDYKE, RICHARD D. KAHN, AND GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendants. 20-cv-484 (JGK) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintif

nder a pseudonym as "Jane Doe" against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as appo

OF NEW YORK JANE DOE, Plaintiff, - against - DARREN K. INDYKE, RICHARD D. KAHN, AND GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

ssed with prejudice, subject to the stipulation with the changes proposed by the Court. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York March 8, 2021 /s/ John G. Koeltl John G. Koeltl United States District Judge 8 EFTA00029963