Epstein Secrets

ts,, 22 construction diagrams, anything like that, documents 2 3 from the contractor? 24 A No, 25 Q No, you didn't, or no — ■ Page 151 i i 1 with Mr. Indyke? 2 A No. 3 Q There appear to be a number of 4 corporations. El Zorro Ranch Corporation, New York 5 Strategy Group, Ghislaine, G-HT-S-L-ArEN-E, 6 Corp

A No, not that I can recall. 20 Q Page 87, last page. Middle of the page 21 references Epstein's corporation attorney, a 22 gentleman by the name: of Darren Indyke/I-N-D-Y-K-E 23 Dp you see that? 24 A Not yet. Okay, yes. 25 Q Do you recall having any conversations: Page 152 1 determination to go to the Grand Jur

poration attorney, a 22 gentleman by the name: of Darren Indyke/I-N-D-Y-K-E 23 Dp you see that? 24 A Not y

settled in the Second Circuit that “a plea agreement in one U.S. Attorney’s office does not, unless otherwise stated, bind another.” United States v. Prisco, 391 F. App’x 920, 921 (2d Cir. 2010) (“A plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is en

to intervene and stay the proceedings in Doe v. Indyke, No. 20 Civ. 484 (JGK), while the Government has

United States v. Post, 950 F. Supp. 2d 519 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 226 United States v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784 (2d Cir. 1984) passim United States v. Prisco, 391 F. App'x 920 (2d Cir. 2010) 4 United States v. Quinones, 511 F.3d 289 (2d Cir. 2007) 251 xix EFTA00099960 United States v. Rahimi, No.

to intervene and stay the proceedings in Doe v. Indyke, No. 20 Civ. 484 (JGK), while the Government has

United States v. Post, 950 F. Supp. 2d 519 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 226 United States v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784 (2d Cir. 1984) passim United States v. Prisco, 391 F. App'x 920 (2d Cir. 2010) 4 United States v. Quinones, 511 F.3d 289 (2d Cir. 2007) 251 xix EFTA00077625 United States v. Rahimi, No.

to intervene and stay the proceedings in Doe v. Indyke, No. 20 Civ. 484 (JGK), while the Government has

United States v. Post, 950 F. Supp. 2d 519 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 226 United States v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784 (2d Cir. 1984) passim United States v. Prisco, 391 F. App'x 920 (2d Cir. 2010) 4 United States v. Quinones, 511 F.3d 289 (2d Cir. 2007) 251 xix EFTA00039440 United States v. Rahimi, No.

to intervene and stay the proceedings in Doe v. Indyke, No. 20 Civ. 484 (JGK), while the Government has

199 United States v. Polos, 723 F. App'x 64 (2d Cir. 2018) 131 United States v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784 (2d Cir. 1984) passim United States v. Prisco, 391 F. App'x 920 (2d Cir. 2010) 4 United States v. Quinones, 511 F.3d 289 (2d Cir. 2007) 165 United States v. Rahimi, 16 Cr. 760 (RMB), 2017

to intervene and stay the proceedings in Doe v. Indyke, No. 20 Civ. 484 (JGK), while the Government has

United States v. Post, 950 F. Supp. 2d 519 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 226 United States v. Potamitis, 739 F.2d 784 (2d Cir. 1984) passim United States v. Prisco, 391 F. App'x 920 (2d Cir. 2010) 4 United States v. Quinones, 511 F.3d 289 (2d Cir. 2007) 251 xix EFTA00103018 United States v. Rahimi, No.