Epstein Secrets

ertain to the Defendant refusing to answer questions during her deposition, directing to go ask the question of Epstein. See Mot. at 19-20 (citing McCawley Dec. at Exhibit 1, Epstein Depo. Tr. at 55:18-56:18 (in answer to question about massages, Defendant states: "I think you should ask that question

A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel: Fax: Email: 21 /s/ Sigrid S. McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley EFTA00622198 United States District Court Southern District of New York Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine

n's Fund Am. Life Ins. Co., 819 F.2d 1471 (8th Cir. 1987) 7, 8 Denney v. Jenkens & Gilchrist, 362 F. Supp. 2d 407 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) 6 F.D.I.C. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 45 F.3d 969 (5th Cir. 1995) 6 In re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation, 2005 WL 375315 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2005) 17 LiButti v. U

ts into the liability case. MR. CASSELL: Right. So Epstein was the one who provided the loan to get that -- THE COURT: Says who? MR. CASSELL: Ms. McCawley, who took Maxwell's deposition, is advising me that during Maxwell's deposition, she conceded that. THE COURT: Well, all right. Okay. But that isn

, oh, it's never been applied in a case like this. I would just direct your attention, as I did during the Epstein argument, to the case of FDIC v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland. That's a Fifth Circuit case from 1995, in which a bank officer was accused of dishonest and fraudulent acts and kind of bogus loans,

, I don't see how that gets MR. CASSELL: Right. So Epstein was the one who provided the loan to get that -- THE COURT: Says who? MR. CASSELL: Ms. McCawley, who took Maxwell's deposition, is advising me that during Maxwell's deposition, she conceded that. THE COURT: Well, all right. Okay. But that isn'

s, oh, it's never been applied in a case like this. I would just direct your attention, as I did during the Epstein argument, to the case of FDIC v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland. That's a Fifth Circuit case from 1995, in which a bank officer was accused of dishonest and fraudulent acts and kind of bogus loans, and