Epstein Secrets

omments, which serve no compelling law enforcement or investigatory purpose, are prohibited by the local rules of this District. New York attorney David Boies and his partner Sigrid McCawley, who represent several witnesses in this matter, have also made public and presumptively prejudicial statements in

practicing in this District, generally, and lawyers for witnesses, specifically. See Rule 23.1(a) and (b). As reported by the Washington Post, Mr. Boies expressed his views on the prohibited subject of "the possibility of a plea of guilty to the offense charged or a lesser offense" in violation of s

a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. Moreover, failure to challenge the designation of any Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIALshall not in any way constitute an admission that such material contains any competitively sensitive information, trade secret information, or other prot

Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT D EFTA00084356 02/26/2016 14:Cgqckg.:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1078-4 Filed 07/29/20 Page 2 of ladi000liao26 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP S6. York Nal shire r California a New Jersey 4 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET TO: Laura Menninger, Esq. Haddon, Morgan and Forem

a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. Moreover, failure to challenge the designation of any Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIALshall not in any way constitute an admission that such material contains any competitively sensitive information, trade secret information, or other prot

nt 1078-4 Filed 07/29/20 Page 2 of Dam 000liao26 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Ngsv York I Washinntore.

a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. Moreover, failure to challenge the designation of any Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIALshall not in any way constitute an admission that such material contains any competitively sensitive information, trade secret information, or other prot