Epstein Secrets

endant, both in New York and in Florida." Dkt. I I, Ex. I at 2. 26 EFTA00039408 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 27 of 33 David Boies, who, as noted, represents identified victims in this case, advised the Court that while a civil case was proceeding against the Defendant "we had s

B Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 27 of 33 David Boies, who, as noted, represents identified victims in

ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization

uality of the process but can also be expected to often provide important benefits to victims."). Ms. Annie Farmer was introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "had the mis- fortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. Ms. Farmer said

nnie Farmer was introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "

, 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings...." United States v. Bartok, 472 F. App./. 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. * 1591 Cases [10] A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victi

improves the quality of the process but can also be expected to often provide important benefits to victims."). Ms. -was introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "had the misfortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. Ms. Farmer said th

ms."). Ms. -was introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "

ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization

fendant, both in New York and in Florida." Dkt. 11, Ex. I at 2. 26 EFTA00074054 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 27 of 33 David Boies, who, as noted, represents identified victims in this case, advised the Court that while a civil case was proceeding against the Defendant "we had s

B Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 27 of 33 David Boies, who, as noted, represents identified victims in

ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization

ms."). Ms Its introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "

voice not only improves the quality of the process but can also be expected to often benefits to victims."). Ms Its introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "had the mis- fortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. Ms. Farmer said

, 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings...." United States v. Bartok, 472 F. App./. 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. * 1591 Cases [10] A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victi