Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
10 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
Boies it was issued. The materials provided by Boies Schiller inclnin addition tIl inscripts of Maxwell and other individuals, materials proday N/14!I
ot. 3, Ex. D at 17). In support of her argument, Maxwell cites again to the Daily News Article, which reports that "after Maxwell's two depositions, David Boies himself apparently approached the government in the summer of 2016, asking `if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury' (
Fifth Amendment privilege, no shield protects the civil evidence [ ] from compellable production before the grand jury which subpoenaed it"). 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights The defendant also claims that the Government's conduct "cannot be squared with elemental due process." (Def. Mot. 3 a
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ot. 3, Ex. D at 17). In support of her argument, Maxwell cites again to the Daily News Article, which reports that "after Maxwell's two depositions, David Boies himself apparently approached the government in the summer of 2016, asking if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury"' (
y contrast, the Government accurately conveyed to Chief Judge McMahon the opening of its investigation in late 2018, the reason it made contact with Boies Schiller shortly thereafter and served a subpoena in February 2019, and that no documents governed by the protective order had yet been produced. A
Fifth Amendment privilege, no shield protects the civil evidence [ ] from compellable production before the grand jury which subpoenaed it"). 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights The defendant also claims that the Government's conduct "cannot be squared with elemental due process." (Def. Mot. 3 a
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ot. 3, Ex. D at 17). In support of her argument, Maxwell cites again to the Daily News Article, which reports that "after Maxwell's two depositions, David Boies himself apparently approached the government in the summer of 2016, asking if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury"' (
y contrast, the Government accurately conveyed to Chief Judge McMahon the opening of its investigation in late 2018, the reason it made contact with Boies Schiller shortly thereafter and served a subpoena in February 2019, and that no documents governed by the protective order had yet been produced. A
Fifth Amendment privilege, no shield protects the civil evidence [ ] from compellable production before the grand jury which subpoenaed it"). 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights The defendant also claims that the Government's conduct "cannot be squared with elemental due process." (Def. Mot. 3 a
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
rtindell standard. "circ --- it cited 11 times in its argument to both relevant courts. (See (Exs. 8 Instead, the Government issued a subpoena to Boies in connection with its investigation, and made an application to two judges to modify Rule 26(c) protective orders that precluded full compliance
ot. 3, Ex. D at 17). In support of her argument, Maxwell cites again to the Daily News Article, which reports that "after Maxwell's two depositions, David Boies himself apparently approached the government in the summer of 2016, asking `if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury' (
Fifth Amendment privilege, no shield protects the civil evidence [ ] from compellable production before the grand jury which subpoenaed it"). 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights The defendant also claims that the Government's conduct "cannot be squared with elemental due process." (Def. Mot. 3 a
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ot. 3, Ex. D at 17). In support of her argument, Maxwell cites again to the Daily News Article, which reports that "after Maxwell's two depositions, David Boies himself apparently approached the government in the summer of 2016, asking `if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury"'
y contrast, the Government accurately conveyed to Chief Judge McMahon the opening of its investigation in late 2018, the reason it made contact with Boies Schiller shortly thereafter and served a subpoena in February 2019, and that no documents governed by the protective order had yet been produced. A
Fifth Amendment privilege, no shield protects the civil evidence [ ] from compellable production before the grand jury which subpoenaed it"). 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights The defendant also claims that the Government's conduct "cannot be squared with elemental due process." (Def. Mot. 3 a
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (259)
Entities connected to both David Boies and The Government Did Not Violate
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON978 w/ David·5 w/ The
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON465 w/ David·5 w/ The
Bradley Edwards
PERSON301 w/ David·5 w/ The
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON157 w/ David·3 w/ The
United States
LOCATION150 w/ David·5 w/ The
the Southern District
LOCATION147 w/ David·5 w/ The
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON143 w/ David·4 w/ The
George Mitchell
PERSON128 w/ David·5 w/ The
JP
Jeffrey Pagliuca
PERSON120 w/ David·5 w/ The
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON112 w/ David·4 w/ The
Julie K. Brown
PERSON107 w/ David·5 w/ The
Colorado
LOCATION86 w/ David·5 w/ The
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON82 w/ David·5 w/ The
Michael Jackson
PERSON76 w/ David·5 w/ The
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION69 w/ David·5 w/ The
Stephen Hawking
PERSON67 w/ David·5 w/ The
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION58 w/ David·5 w/ The
SW
Sweet
PERSON48 w/ David·5 w/ The
United Kingdom
LOCATION46 w/ David·5 w/ The
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON42 w/ David·5 w/ The