Epstein Secrets

endant, both in New York and in Florida." Dkt. I I, Ex. I at 2. 26 EFTA00039408 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 27 of 33 David Boies, who, as noted, represents identified victims in this case, advised the Court that while a civil case was proceeding against the Defendant "we had s

B Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 27 of 33 David Boies, who, as noted, represents identified victims in

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

uality of the process but can also be expected to often provide important benefits to victims."). Ms. Annie Farmer was introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "had the mis- fortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. Ms. Farmer said

nnie Farmer was introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "

es forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the juris- diction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the pre- sumption remains in the case as an eviden- tiary finding militating against release, to be wei

improves the quality of the process but can also be expected to often provide important benefits to victims."). Ms. -was introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "had the misfortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. Ms. Farmer said th

ms."). Ms. -was introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

fendant, both in New York and in Florida." Dkt. 11, Ex. I at 2. 26 EFTA00074054 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 27 of 33 David Boies, who, as noted, represents identified victims in this case, advised the Court that while a civil case was proceeding against the Defendant "we had s

B Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 27 of 33 David Boies, who, as noted, represents identified victims in

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

ms."). Ms Its introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "

voice not only improves the quality of the process but can also be expected to often benefits to victims."). Ms Its introduced by her counsel, David Boies, and stated that she was 16 years old when she "had the mis- fortune of meeting Jeffrey Epstein [in] New York." 7/15/19 Tr. at 72. Ms. Farmer said

es forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the juris- diction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the pre- sumption remains in the case as an eviden- tiary finding militating against release, to be wei