Epstein Secrets

ference between EFTA00027039 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 100 Filed 12/20/19 Page 2 of 5 himself and Plaintiff's attorney, David Boles.' This unauthorized recording, use, and disclosure of a communication made on Plaintiff's behalf for the purpose of defaming Plaintiff violates 18

osing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.—the leave sought should, as the rules require, `be freely given.' Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962) (quoting FED. R. Ctv. P. 15(a)). "[A]bsent a showing of bad faith or undue prejudice," mere delay "does not provi

following: Sigrid S. McCawley Meredith Schultz BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boule

. . undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [and] futility of amendment.’” Laurie, 256 F.3d at 1274 (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). In addition to considering the effect of amendment on the parties, the court must consider “the importance of t

following: Sigrid S. McCawley Meredith Schultz BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 401 East Las Olas Boule

. . . undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, [and] futility of amendment.’” Laurie, 256 F.3d at 1274 (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). In addition to considering the effect of amendment on the parties, the court must consider “the importance of th