Epstein Secrets

involved return of a large sum of money to the Plaintiffs. 1 ROTHSTEIN HOSENFIZOT ADLEFt Las OW City Centre, 401E. Las Ohs Roulccird, Suite 1650, Fon Lauderdale, Florida 33301 EFTA00795682 6. Upon receipt of the orders, the undersigned began to put into place all actions necessary to timely comply witivs

AKA: BAY 1 PORTS1DE l ir (RPI3) 1012 East Broward B ard, as "Defendant and easeme 6 31.74, N 24.00, E 49.07 TO FOB umber of 5042 23 28 0010; rt Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to ' i des all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments therein or thereon, and is more particularly descr

efendant Rothstein are the sole owners of the equity in the firm. 5. The firm's principal office is located at 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. 6. Venue properly lies with this Court because the firm's prin Broward County. L BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISSOLU ION The Firm 8;

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 3rd day of November, 2009, with the agreement and consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik, Esq., a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at [email protected]. This 3rd day of November, 2009.

consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik, Esq., a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at [email protected]. This 3rd day of November, 2009. 'Si Fla LA M. Baia.i 9 COFFEY B URLINGTON OFFICE IN THE. GROVE, PENTHOUSE 2699 SOU I H

of the contract, as facts underlying all counts were interrelated). BACKGROUNDS This unique and complex case arose from the 2009 implosion of the Fort Lauderdale law firm Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, where defendant/counter- plaintiff Bradley Edwards worked and held himself out as a partner. The principal o

d from this case on August 9, 2010. (App. 5). 5 EFTA00793697 all claims in the December 7, 2009 Complaint. (App. 4). Rothstein retained counsel, Mark Nurik, who moved to set aside the default, but an order was never entered on that motion. Mr. Nurik has not withdrawn from this case and has been on the

Complaint. (App. 4). Rothstein retained counsel, Mark Nurik, who moved to set aside the default, but an order was never entered on that motion. Mr. Nurik has not withdrawn from this case and has been on the service list since 2010. On April 12, 2011, Epstein filed an Amended Complaint against Rothste

efendant Rothstein are the sole owners of the equity in the firm. 5. The firm's principal office is located at 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL. 33301. 6. Venue properly lies with this Court because the firm's principal office is in Broward County. BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTI

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 3rd day of November, 2009, with the agreement and consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik, Esq., a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at [email protected]. This 3rd day of November, 2009.

consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik, Esq., a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at [email protected]. This 3rd day of November, 2009. 9 COFFEY B UR LINGTON OFFICE IN THE GROVE, PENTIIOUSE 2699 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, F

s involved return of a large sum of money to the Plaintiffs. 1 ROTHSTEIN ROSEATELOT Anwi LAS OW City Centre, 401E. Las Ohs Bouleyard, Suite 1650, Fors Lauderdale, Florida 33301 EFTA00729498 6. Upon receipt of the orders, the undersigned began to put into place all actions necessary to timely comply with s

efendant Rothstein are the sole owners of the equity in the firm. 5. The firm's principal office is located at 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. 6. Venue properly lies with this Court because the firm's principal office is in Broward County. BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTIO

d consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik Es , a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at This 3rd day of November, 2009. M.P ICSAM 9 COFFEY B 1./RLINGTON OFFICE IN THE GROVE, PENTHOUSE 2699 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA

700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort-Lauderdale; FL 33301 EFTA00208204 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 177-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2012 Page 21 of 22 TO A HADDAD, PA nurc Lanaoraate,

data, correspondence, and similar documents dated April 1, 2008 through August 1, 2010 by and between Bradley J. Edwards. Scott W. Rothstein, Marc, Nurik, Cara Holmes, Mike Fisten and any on of he following regarding or mentioning Jeffrey Epstein in any way: (a) the U.S. Attorney's Office, (b) the St

18951 2981 Monte Susie Avestan, Maids 33180 CHARLES H. uarrmAtt ESQUIRE BERGER SINUERMAN, ATTORNEYSATLAW 350 Emu 1.4 OlasEkelevard Suite 1000 Fen Lauderdale. Mende 333301 MICHAEL 3 PIXE ESQUIRE, ESQUIRE BURMAN, OUTICN, LUTTIER & COIRMAN, LIP 303 Banyan Boulevard Suiio 400 West Palm Bach. Maid', 33408

pon counsel in the sense this was an emergency hearing. THE COURT: Did he accept service? MR. JOSEPH GELLER: We have not spoken directly with Mr. Nurik and have not — THE COURT: But you delivered copies of these papers with a notice bearing upon Mr. Nurik? MR. JOSEPH GELLER: They were served by fa

proper predicate to the question. Assumes facts not In evidence. THE WITNESS: I don't know. BY MR. LINK: 0 Can you tell no ono other lawyer in Fort Lauderdale that has the Bugatti, Ferraris, Rolla-Royce, Lantorghlal, two bodyguards, a very large house on the , and a 90-foot boat? MR. SCAROLA: Objectio

f them wore appealed. I wa➢ reversed a number of times. 23 0 Rough gue➢➢? 24 A I Couldn't tell you. I couldn't tell you how 2S many [limos. Nurik or Rothstein -- did they feel bullied or 2 threatened by Epstein lawyer➢? MR. SCAAOLA: Objection, predicate. 4 THE WITNESS: You are assuming tha

efendant Rothstein are the sole owners of the equity in the firm. 5. The firm's principal office is located at 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. 6. Venue properly lies with this Court because the firm's principal office is in Broward County. BACKGROUND AND GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTIO

and consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik E a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at This 3rd day of November, 2009. s; S 9 COFFEY B URLINGTON OI+ICk IN THE DROVE. PENTHOUSE 2699 SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33 133