Epstein Secrets

stify the privilege claim. A similar undated letter was invented for Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman (FJW), P.L, and co-counsel, Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Menninger Decl., Ex. L. It states: Again, while the letter is conveniently and purposefully undated, it and therefore must have been created

Communications and Attorney Work Product (Doc. # 164), Plaintiff waived her attorney-client and work product privileges with attorneys Edwards and Cassell. She cannot, therefore, revive those privileges by over-laying some novel "common interest" agreement with her own attorneys. Furthermore, Jack Sca

Schiller's public statements concerning its representation of Plaintiff, in which they claimed to be acting pro bono: "According to a statement by Boies, Schiller & Flexner, the firm is representing Roberts on a pro bono basis: The firm's pro bono program focuses on meaningful cases including trying to assist women and

this is a voice message that SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA_R1_00024127 EFTA01737531 21 G6ndgium Ms. Churcher left for Paul Cassell, who is a lawyer in this case who entered an appearance in this case, in February of 2015. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1

been provided, and it's germane to the issues before the Court. But what it reveals is that this is not Ms. Churcher's first interaction with Mr. Cassell, lawyer for the plaintiff. They are on a first-name basis. She is feeling free to call him and leave messages for him. And what she wants to discu

The problem for me or the problem for them? THE COURT: The problem for the plaintiffs. MS. SCHULTZ: Thank you, your Honor. Meredith Schultz, from Boies, Schiller & Flexner, on behalf of Ms. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA_R1_00024114 EFTA01737518 8 G6ndgium 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

orneys representing Plaintiff in her various media deals and litigations, would be deemed a violation of the Order of this Court. On April 4, 2016 Paul G. Cassell filed a motion to appear on behalf of the Plaintiff in this matter. Ms. Maxwell objected to the motion by letter to the Court dated April 5, 2016. T

duled a hearing on the objection. Mr. Edwards' Motion to Appear followed. Mr. Edwards' appearance in this matter is as inappropriate as that of Mr. Cassell. Mr. Edwards is a named Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant in an action captioned Edwards and Edwards, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants v.

for the following reasons. ARGUMENT This case has been pending since September 21, 2015. Plaintiff is represented in this case by 4 attorneys from Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP who have entered their appearances in this matter. On March 18, 2016, the Court entered a Protective Order restricting the use of information

orneys representing Plaintiff in her various media deals and litigations, would be deemed a violation of the Order of this Court. On April 4, 2016 Paul G. Cassell filed a motion to appear on behalf of the Plaintiff in this matter. Ms. Maxwell objected to the motion by letter to the Court dated April 5, 2016. T

duled a hearing on the objection. Mr. Edwards' Motion to Appear followed. Mr. Edwards' appearance in this matter is as inappropriate as that of Mr. Cassell. Mr. Edwards is a named Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant in an action captioned Edwards and Edwards, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants v.

for the following reasons. ARGUMENT This case has been pending since September 21, 2015. Plaintiff is represented in this case by 4 attorneys from Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP who have entered their appearances in this matter. On March 18, 2016, the Court entered a Protective Order restricting the use of information