Epstein Secrets

ein again steps beyond the absolute protection of the litigation privilege. 8. Epstein, through counsel, also suggests that Jack Scarola, Esq. and Paul Cassell, Esq. may somehow be implicated in nefarious conduct and requests their depositions in a desperate attempt to avoid trial once again. The emails in

l, also suggests that Jack Scarola, Esq. and Paul Cassell, Esq. may somehow be implicated in nefarious con

ion titled "Edwards' Direct Involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme." If nothing but consistent, Epstein, through counsel, then sprinkles throughout the Motion for Court to Declare Relevance direct accusations and implicit insinuations that, regardless of whether 2 The idiom "jumping the shark" is a pejorative refer

Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Limited Intervenor a -Counsel for E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 64

Containing Privileged Materials Page 4 — Provided illustra ive samples of e-mails: • 4408-4412 is an 10/17/09 e-mail exchange between Edwards and Cassell. • 4399-4400 is an 10/17/09 e-mail exchange between Edwards and Cassell. • Multiple e-mails dated 10/23/09 about Edwards' direct participation wi

ion titled 'Edwards' Direct Involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme.' If nothing but consistent, Epstein, through counsel, then sprinkles throughout the Motion for Court to Declare Relevance direct accusations and implicit insinuations that, regardless of whether Epstein had probable cause to institute or continue h

ue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 igoldbergerRagwpa.com [email protected] Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 cassellpalaw.utah.edu Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell

laintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University St. Salt Lake City, UT 84112-

ion titled 'Edwards' Direct Involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme.' If nothing but consistent, Epstein, through counsel, then sprinkles throughout the Motion for Court to Declare Relevance direct accusations and implicit insinuations that, regardless of whether Epstein had probable cause to institute or continue h