Epstein Secrets

alive, which distinguishes it from our case. Nevertheless, I think it is irrelevant because in evaluating the Rule 48 motion, then district Judge Paul G. Cassell -- who is now a law professor at the University of Utah and is regarded to be a noted expert in victims' rights -- concluded that under the Crime Vi

24 25 is a model for how victims should be treated in a criminal process, and we really do appreciate it. Thank you. THE COURT: Thank you. MR. CASSELL: I'll be very brief because I know there are others that want to speak here. I'm Paul Cassell, C-a-s-s-e-1-1, previously served as a federal judge

I will be more blunt than the Court has been, or Professor Cassell has been about Professor Green's article. That i

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

alive, which distinguishes it from our case. Nevertheless, I think it is irrelevant because in evaluating the Rule 48 motion, then district Judge Paul G. Cassell -- who is now a law professor at the University of Utah and is regarded to be a noted expert in victims' rights -- concluded that under the Crime Vi

24 25 is a model for how victims should be treated in a criminal process, and we really do appreciate it. Thank you. THE COURT: Thank you. MR. CASSELL: I'll be very brief because I know there are others that want to speak here. I'm Paul Cassell, C-a-s-s-e-1-1, previously served as a federal judge

I will be more blunt than the Court has been, or Professor Cassell has been about Professor Green's article. That i

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

alive, which distinguishes it from our case. Nevertheless, I think it is irrelevant because in evaluating the Rule 48 motion, then district Judge Paul G. Cassell -- who is now a law professor at the University of Utah and is regarded to be a noted expert in victims' rights -- concluded that under the Crime Vi

24 25 is a model for how victims should be treated in a criminal process, and we really do appreciate it. Thank you. THE COURT: Thank you. MR. CASSELL: I'll be very brief because I know there are others that want to speak here. I'm Paul Cassell, C-a-s-s-e-1-1, previously served as a federal judge

I will be more blunt than the Court has been, or Professor Cassell has been about Professor Green's article. That i

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

alive, which distinguishes it from our case. Nevertheless, I think it is irrelevant because in evaluating the Rule 48 motion, then district Judge Paul G. Cassell -- who is now a law professor at the University of Utah and is regarded to be a noted expert in victims' rights -- concluded that under the Crime Vi

24 25 is a model for how victims should be treated in a criminal process, and we really do appreciate it. Thank you. THE COURT: Thank you. MR. CASSELL: I'll be very brief because I know there are others that want to speak here. I'm Paul Cassell, C-a-s-s-e-1-1, previously served as a federal judge

I will be more blunt than the Court has been, or Professor Cassell has been about Professor Green's article. That i

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

alive, which distinguishes it from our case. Nevertheless, I think it is irrelevant because in evaluating the Rule 48 motion, then district Judge Paul G. Cassell -- who is now a law professor at the University of Utah and is regarded to be a noted expert in victims' rights concluded that under the Crime Vict

25 J8RPEPS2 is a model for how victims should be treated in a criminal process, and we really do appreciate it. Thank you. THE COURT: Thank you. MR. CASSELL: I'll be very brief because I know there are others that want to speak here. I'm Paul Cassell, C-a-s-s-e-1-1, previously served as a federal judge at

I will be more blunt than the Court has been, or Professor Cassell has been about Professor Green's article. That is

pstein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's motion

the Rule 48 motion, then district Judge Paul G. Cassell -- who is now a law professor at the University o

alive, which distinguishes it from our case. Nevertheless, I think it is irrelevant because in evaluating the Rule 48 motion, then district Judge Paul G. Cassell -- who is now a law professor at the University of Utah and is regarded to be a noted expert in victims' rights -- concluded that under the Crime Vi

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

ein-related cases. I was surprised to learn that very recently. I'm certain it is true. I was also surprised that that aspect was not disclosed in the Law Journal. But in any event, I think you know where I'm heading. I respectfully disagree with the Law Journal piece. I was saying that the government's moti

which distinguishes it from our case. Nevertheless, I think it is irrelevant because in evaluating the Rule 48 motion, then district Judge Paul G. Cassell -- who is now a law professor at the University of Utah and is regarded to be a noted expert in victims' rights -- concluded that under the Crime Vi

: Thank you. MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, finally, in 2008 when I filed the case under the Crime Victims Rights Act, it wasn't me alone. I did it with Paul Cassell and Jay Howell. Paul Cassell is here today, and I think your Honor even cited to a piece of -- an opinion of his from when he was on the bench, an