Epstein Secrets

rs.")). 13 Id. at 19. 10 Id. at 1.3. 21 EFTA00605135 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 228 Filed 06/20/16 Page 25 of 29 Notice of Deposition for Juan Alessi on May 31, 2016, without any conferral with counsel, in Florida, fully aware that defense counsel would be traveling from Colorado. Defense counsel,

would be traveling from Colorado. Defense counsel, in fact, did have to travel on Memorial Day to Florida for the 9:00 a.m. May 31 deposition. Mr. Alessi, however, did not appear on that date, believing that his deposition was for June 1, the same day that his wife had been subpoenaed to appear and be

ts, no deposition occurred on May 31. On June 1, Mr. Alessi appeared, but there was insufficient time to take

that witness Rinaldo Rizzo had a deposition re-scheduled from April until June does not have any bearing on the issue presented by this motion. Mr. Rizzo was deposed on June 14 and he has nothing to do with the remaining depositions. Mr. Rizzo, in fact, was practically gleeful to be a witness: Doc.

than any other evidence that the proponent can obtain through reasonable efforts" is at best disingenuous. Plaintiff has designated the testimony of Juan Alessi, Mr. Rodriguez's predecessor who held that position during the timeframe in which Plaintiff claims to have been held as a "sex slave" by Mr. Epstei

s. Plaintiff has designated the testimony of Juan Alessi, Mr. Rodriguez's predecessor who held that posit

trial. She has now obtained an agreement to accept service by Mr. Epstein's counsel, mooting any claim that he is unavailable.' With respect to Mr. Rizzo, she concedes he resides within 100 miles of the courthouse, and provides no basis to claim that he cannot be served. Based on these confessions, th

Petition; CVRA-authorized release; Material Severable; Redaction; No Assertion by Victims Box #1 P-005301 Thru P-005331 File folder entitled "JUAN ALESSI STATEMENT" containing transcript obtained via subpoena 6(e) Investigative privilege Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty;

05301 Thru P-005331 File folder entitled "JUAN ALESSI STATEMENT" containing transcript obtained via

Tuite v. Henry, 98 F.3d 1411, 1418 (D.C. Cir. 1996). The balancing is ordinarily made by considering the ten factors identified in Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339, 344 (E.D. Pa. 1973). Those ten factors decisively tip in favor of the victims receiving access to the information. D. Work Product