Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
80431, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2007), aff'd, 348 F. App'x 636, 638 (2d Cir. 2009) (first alteration in original) (quoting Werner, 620 F2d at 927). Joinder is also proper for "distinct criminal acts where they originated from a common scheme." United States v. Ying Lin, No. 15 Cr. 601 (DLI), 2018 WL 511
nevitably' even if there had been no statutory or constitutional violation." United States v. Roberts, 852 F.2d 671, 675-76 (2d Cir. 1988) (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 447 (1984)). When a claim of inevitable discovery is raised, the court must "determine, viewing affairs as they existed at the insta
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
80431, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2007), aff'd, 348 F. App'x 636, 638 (2d Cir. 2009) (first alteration in original) (quoting Werner, 620 F2d at 927). Joinder is also proper for "distinct criminal acts where they originated from a common scheme." United States v. Ying Lin, No. 15 Cr. 601 (DLI), 2018 WL 511
nevitably' even if there had been no statutory or constitutional violation." United States v. Roberts, 852 F.2d 671, 675-76 (2d Cir. 1988) (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 447 (1984)). When a claim of inevitable discovery is raised, the court must "determine, viewing affairs as they existed at the insta
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
80431, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2007), aff'd, 348 F. App'x 636, 638 (2d Cir. 2009) (first alteration in original) (quoting Werner, 620 F2d at 927). Joinder is also proper for "distinct criminal acts where they originated from a common scheme." United States v. Ying Lin, No. 15 Cr. 601 (DLI), 2018 WL 511
nevitably' even if there had been no statutory or constitutional violation." United States v. Roberts, 852 F.2d 671, 675-76 (2d Cir. 1988) (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 447 (1984)). When a claim of inevitable discovery is raised, the court must "determine, viewing affairs as they existed at the insta
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
80431, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2007), aff'd, 348 F. App'x 636, 638 (2d Cir. 2009) (first alteration in original) (quoting Werner, 620 F2d at 927). Joinder is also proper for "distinct criminal acts where they originated from a common scheme." United States v. Ying Lin, No. 15 Cr. 601 (DLI), 2018 WL 511
nevitably' even if there had been no statutory or constitutional violation." United States v. Roberts, 852 F.2d 671, 675-76 (2d Cir. 1988) (quoting Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 447 (1984)). When a claim of inevitable discovery is raised, the court must "determine, viewing affairs as they existed at the insta
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (257)
Entities connected to both Joinder and Nix v. Williams
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON23 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
Bradley Edwards
PERSON17 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON14 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON12 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
the Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
United States
LOCATION11 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON10 w/ Joinder·4 w/ Nix
Julie K. Brown
PERSON9 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
JP
Jeffrey Pagliuca
PERSON9 w/ Joinder·4 w/ Nix
WE
Werner
PERSON8 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON8 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
Bill Richardson
PERSON8 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON8 w/ Joinder·4 w/ Nix
Michael Jackson
PERSON7 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
Kendall Coffey
PERSON7 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
David Boies
PERSON7 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
Colorado
LOCATION7 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
SW
Sweet
PERSON7 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix
PO
Potamitis
PERSON8 w/ Joinder·4 w/ Nix
LP
Loretta A. Preska
PERSON7 w/ Joinder·5 w/ Nix