Epstein Secrets

wards 3 directly from the Fourth Diatrict Court of Appeal, 4 has asked about and answered that are on this 4 RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it s privilege log. There's over a hundred of then. 5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate 4 So this disk is not a di➢k of their privil

e fourth thing i0 we want an order directing a gain knowledge that is likely residing at the S Mr. Epstein not to reveal the contents of this 9 Fouler White firm in scan form or fashion, whether 9 information to anyone. We are told that 10 lc be current or former employees or otherwise. So 10

wards 3 directly from the Fourth Diatrict Court of Appeal, 4 has asked about and answered that are on this 4 RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it s privilege log. There's over a hundred of then. 5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate 4 So this disk is not a di➢k of their privil

e fourth thing i0 we want an order directing a gain knowledge that is likely residing at the S Mr. Epstein not to reveal the contents of this 9 Fouler White firm in scan form or fashion, whether 9 information to anyone. We are told that 10 lc be current or former employees or otherwise. So 10

em. • presentation. I often refer to a case that I printed directly from the Fourth District Court of Appeal, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it talks about the trial judge's ultimate So this disk is not a disk of their privileged docunents. It's a disk of 27,500 documents. And wha

the orderly disk Ln there. So what I'm suggesting is if we're I9 administration of justice and, correspondingly, the trying to figure out whether Fouler White violated 20 orderly preparation for trial. That preparation -- the order, I don't think it's as clear as 21 and you'll be surprised when it