Epstein Secrets

e, Justice John Paul Stevens was joined by Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice Sotomayor. To emphasize his unhappiness with the majority, Stevens read part of his go-page dissent from the bench. Stevens concurred in the Court's decision to sustain BCRA's disclosure provisions, but dissented fr

In the dissenting opinion of the Citizens United v. FEC case, Justice John Paul Stevens was joined by Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice Sotomayor. To emphasize his unhappiness with the majority, Stevens read part of his go-page dissent from the bench. Stevens concurred in the Court's decision

tices were observed to be more closely aligned than Scalia and Thomas. Still in 2006, Thomas voted with Scalia 91 percent and with Justice John Paul Stevens the least, 36% of the time. As for Thomas, he is physically transformed from his infamous confirmation hearings, in 1991—a great deal grayer and he

it's Alive WI Inline image 1 Clarence Thomas speaks in Supreme Court for first time in to years Imagine this, until a week ago, neither Justices Sonia Sotomayor nor Elena Kagan, the Court's youngest members on the Supreme Court who sit on opposite ends of the bench, and who both often take aggressive tones

led to a special categorical protection of the Fourth Amendment."); Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27. 41, 121 S.Ct. 2038, 150 L.Ed.2d 94 (2001) (Stevens, J., dissenting) (explaining that Fourth Amendment exceptions and distinctions based solely on a type of technology are "unwise[ ] and inconsisten

rast to the generic and impersonal contents of a gas tank. See, e.g., United States v. Jones, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 945, 957, 181 L.Ed.2d 911 (2012) (Sotomayor, J., concurring) (expressing "doubt that people would accept without complaint the warrantless disclosure to the Government of a list of every Web