Epstein Secrets

led to a special categorical protection of the Fourth Amendment."); Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27. 41, 121 S.Ct. 2038, 150 L.Ed.2d 94 (2001) (Stevens, J., dissenting) (explaining that Fourth Amendment exceptions and distinctions based solely on a type of technology are "unwise[ ] and inconsisten

K. Burke, Christina M. Cabanillas, Carmen F. Corbin, John S. Leonardo, John J. Tuchi, United States Attorney's Office for the District of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, for Appellant. William J. Kirchner, Law Office of Nash & Kirchner, M. Tucson, AZ, for Appellee. David M. Porter, Melia N. Brink, National As

de to forensic behavioral sciences (2nd ed.; pp. 199-228). Charles C. Thomas. Davis, D. & Loftus, E.F. (2018) Eyewitness Science in the 21' Century. Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. Vol 1: Learning and Memory. 4th Ed. Wiley 2019 Loftus, E.F. & Teitcher, J. (2019)

Memorial Lecture, Minnesota Psychology Undergraduate Conference, Macalester College, MN National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), Tucson, AZ Vrije Universiteit (Free University), Amsterdam, Netherlands American Psychological Society, Teaching Institute, Miami, FL Oregon Associatio

t al. (sadomasochistic sex trafficking) Consultant to the defense in U.S. v. David H. Brooks (white collar crimes) Consultant to the plaintiff in Stevens v. U.S. (anthrax attack) Consultant to the United States Attorney's Office, Tucson, AZ, in U.S. v. Jared Loughner (Tucson mass murder and assassi

Brooks (white collar crimes) Consultant to the plaintiff in Stevens v. U.S. (anthrax attack) Consultant to the United States Attorney's Office, Tucson, AZ, in U.S. v. Jared Loughner (Tucson mass murder and assassination attempt) Consultant to the defense in litigation filed against PG&E in connec