Epstein Secrets

he Henry Hub and hubs in California, this narrowing does not decrease the burden on McGraw- Hill for the reasons set forth in the Declarations of Mr. Foster. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that McGraw-Hill's motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum and ad testificandum is granted. - End of Case - C

has held that, when faced with a combination of federal claims and pendent state law claims, federal common law controls under Rule 501. Hancock v. Dodson, 958 F.2d 1367, 1372-73 (6th Cir. 1992) ("Since the instant case is a federal question case by virtue of the appellant's section 1983 claim, we hold

he Henry Hub and hubs in California, this narrowing does not decrease the burden on McGraw- Hill for the reasons set forth in the Declarations of Mr. Foster. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that McGraw-Hill's motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum and ad testificandum is granted. - End of Case - C

has held that, when faced with a combination of federal claims and pendent state law claims, federal common law controls under Rule 501. Hancock v. Dodson, 958 F.2d 1367, 1372-73 (6th Cir. 1992) ("Since the instant case is a federal question case by virtue of the appellant's section 1983 claim, we hold

ity, however. ee, e.g. Omaha Pub. Power Dist. . Foster Wheeler Corp., 109 F.R. . 615, 616-17 (D.Neb.19

and finding that "it also would be impractical to apply two different rules of priv- ilege to the same evideny before a single jury."); Hancock . Dodson, 958 F.2d 1367, 1373 (6 Cir.1992) (holding that the existence of pen- dent state claim did not relieve the Court of its obligation to apply the