Epstein Secrets

de v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 52-58 (1991) (defining "prompt" under Gerstein's requirement of a prompt judicial determination of probable cause). 6 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 86 (1963) (holding prosecution's withholding of the confession of defendant's confederate violated defendant's due process

aughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 52-58 (1991) (defining "prompt" under Gerstein's requirement of a prompt judicial determination of probable cause). 6 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 86 (1963) (holding prosecution's withholding of the confession of defendant's confederate violated defendant's due process rights). 7

thowily oposed To the sower risk of the C mina, triads and there t rq guarantee- other ob SAM of ISSAS Ao may the batalaShh le m the LOS Capial'S Brady, boas Depose, a UN Bra USA rd ea& UPS AG Brach and prceecied by SIC Money Prod shies are preceded by SPC See -165 Foaled Sevoes Accoure Fatection-

e thaw cr hgher thre the wended anwiis - an newt el seualwel amine Retired neer newest deeded by the amen make, valxfatwar balareetmed Co the lad Ryland or owed parrem nude byte thine aid asfeenes the writ indepor s all be nadir one yet *cm thei statement &loot wee miurty Array and corned rid at n

e subpoena ex parte. 239 Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c). 240 See E-mail from Rod Rosenstein, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland, to Russell Butler, Maryland Crime Victims’ Resource Center, Inc. (Jan. 3, 2007), reprinted in Testimony of Russell Butler to the Federal Criminal Rules Advisory Comm. App. A (Ja

lso United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 629 (2002) (quoting Weatherford, 429 U.S. at 559). 298 Wardius v. Oregon, 412 U.S. 470,474 (1973). 299 See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963). 300 See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 675 (1985). 301 United States v. Garrett, 238 F.3d 293, 302 (St