Epstein Secrets

s amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), and Pierce Cou

cution of Epstein might still occur. Even though petitioners do not dispute that Epstein sought review at the DOJ, first at the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, then at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, they dismiss the Government's argument as "resorts to technicalities." D.E

amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995). Thus, Congress'

y had abused his discretion by conducting a federal criminal investigation and negotiating the NPA. Epstein first presented his appeal to the DOJ's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, part of the Criminal Division. They met with the Chief and Deputy Chief of the Child Ex loitation and Obscenity Section, and

s amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), and Pierce Cou

cution of Epstein might still occur. Even though petitioners do not dispute that Epstein sought review at the DOJ, first at the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, then at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, they dismiss the Government's argument as "resorts to technicalities." ■.