Epstein Secrets

could initiate suit. The recent case of U.S. v. Baker, 2009 WL 4572785, *7-8 (E.D. Tx Dec. 7, 2009), i

of the claim." As stated by the Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-323, 106 S.Ct. 254

1181, 1186 (11th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted)). Under the 2003 version of the statute, only minors could initiate suit. The recent case of U.S. v. Baker, 2009 WL 4572785, •7-8 (ED. Tx Dec. 7, 2009), in discussing the restitution under 18 U.S.C. §2255 noted that when the statute was amended in 2006 —

ief is sought may move, with or without supporting affidavits, for summary judgment on all or part of the claim." As stated by the Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322- 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 (1986) ... summary judgment is proper "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interroga

). B. Personal Jurisdiction 5] The Plaintiff has the burden of establishing personal jurisdiction by a pre- ponderance of the evidence. Combs v. Bakker, 886 F2d 673 (4th Cir.1989). A two-prong test governs an analysis of in personam jurisdiction. The first prong re- quires that the activiti,te defe

en of proof, simply point out to the Court that "the nonmoving party has failed to make a sufficient showing of an essential element of her case." Celotex Corp. v. Cat rett, 477 U.S. 317, 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed2d 265 (1986). All doubts as to the existence of a genu- ine issue of material fact must be