Epstein Secrets

any of the above information and the information included Villafafia's attached letter, please contact me at your convenience. Very truly yours, BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC /s/ Jonathan Biran JB/smr 4822.54644166v1 2865555-000127 05/1012019 EFTA00223101

encrypted disks containing the exhibits referenced in er written response, and has emailed other exhibits that were not included on the disks. Mr. Ragsdale's letter also requested background information concerning Villafaiia's professional background and experience. The remainder of this letter provides

rand jury to attorney Jonathan Biran of the firm Baker Donelson to allow him to fulfill his obligations

for example, "[e]xplain why the USAO decided to initiate a federal grand jury investigation" (id. at 2). 16. I prepared a 58-page response to Mr. Ragsdale's letter ("Response"), along with a 51- page timeline ("Timeline"), a 14-page chart summarizing victim notifications ("Chart"), a 10-page exhibit li

rand jury to attorney Jonathan Biran of the firm Baker Donelson to allow him to fulfill his obligations

on, for example, le]xplain why the USAO decided to initiate a federal grand jury investigation" (id. at 2). 15.Mprepared a 58-page response to Mr. Ragsdale's letter ("Response"), along with a 51-page timeline ("Timeline"), a 14-page chart summarizing victim notifications ("Chart"), a 10-page exhibit li

l division. Please advise if further information is needed. Sincerely, dal Marta rilliskrages. A. Marie Villafaila Page 58 of 58 EFTA00225540 BAKER,DONELSON 100 116111 STREET • BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21202 • 410.685.1120. bakerdonelson.com JONATHAN BRAN Direct Dial: 410.862.1073 E-Mail Addresall

ncrypted disks containing the exhibits referenced in her written response, and has emailed other exhibits that were not included on the disks. Mr. Ragsdale's letter also requested background information concerning AUSA Villafafia's professional background and experience. The remainder of this letter pro

f the Act. 29 U.S.C. 156. A determination of necessity under Section 6 made by the Board, as administrator of the NLRA, is entitled to deference. See Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc., 535 U.S. 81, 86 (2002). Furthermore, even in the absence of express rulemaking authority, “the power of an administra

on misconduct that they say should be included. As with the notice’s statement of affirmative rights, some of the 108 See, e.g., comments of COLLE, Baker & McKenzie, National Association of Manufacturers, and American Trucking Association. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022294 --- PAGE BREAK --- 54024 Federal Regist