Epstein Secrets

ee Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 9. The search results suggest the "possibility that defendant could target an- other vulnerable victim." See United States v. Baker, 349 F. Supp. 3d 1113, 1135 (D.N.M. 2018) (where the defendant was alleged to specifically target "vulnerable women" and where he attempted to con

ewspapers and magazines" none of which could have been privileged if only because they were not confidential lawyer-client communica- tions. In re Chevron Corp., 749 F. Supp. 2d at 184. Thus, the privilege log tardily sub- mitted in the prior case was not a good faith attempt to make only colorable claims

ee Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 9. The search results suggest the "possibility that defendant could target an- other vulnerable victim." See United States v. Baker, 349 F. Supp. 3d 1113, 1135 (D.N.M. 2018) (where the defendant was alleged to specifically target "vulnerable women" and where he attempted to con

ewspapers and magazines" none of which could have been privileged if only because they were not confidential lawyer-client communica- tions. In re Chevron Corp., 749 F. Supp. 2d at 184. Thus, the privilege log tardily sub- mitted in the prior case was not a good faith attempt to make only colorable claims

ml. 2 See Criminal Information, United States v. Baker Hughes Svcs. Int'l, No. 07-cr-129 (S.D. Tex. Apr

0-06ssi-information.pdf. 236 See, CL5 Complaint, SEC v. El Paso Corp., supra note 187; Complaint, SEC v. Innospec, supra note 79; Complaint, SEC vy. Chevron Corp., 07- cv-10299 (S.D.NLY. Nov. 14, 2007), ECF No. 1, available at http://www. sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2007/comp20363 pdf. 237 Diea Agreement, Un