Epstein Secrets

t be serving in a position in the Defense Department."' The New York Times <https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/03/us/politics/tata-pentagon.html> (8/3, Cooper, 18.6IM) reports, "On Monday at the Pentagon, where military officials have already been engaged in a tug of war with Mr. Trump over the president'

ite House lawyer and senior Justice Department official James Burnham, and former Stone associate Randy Credico are also almost entirely redacted." McFarland and Credico's summaries include "markings that indicate redacted information relates to ongoing EFTA00136436 investigations." A chunk of the 412 p

sed by senators of both parties can be resolved, Gen. Tata should not be serving in a position in the Defense Department." The New York Times (8/3, Cooper, 18.61M) reports, "On Monday at the Pentagon, where military officials have already been engaged in a tug of war with Mr. Trump over the president's

ite House lawyer and senior Justice Department official James Burnham, and former Stone associate Randy Credico are also almost entirely redacted." McFarland and Credico's summaries include "markings that indicate redacted information relates to ongoing investigations." A chunk of the 412 pages of intervi

of both parties can be resolved, Gen. Tata should not be serving in a position in the Defense Department:" EFTA01658015 The New York Times (8/3, Cooper, 18.61M) reports, "On Monday at the Pentagon, where military officials have already been engaged in a tug of war with Mr. Trump over the president's

ite House lawyer and senior Justice Department official James Burnham, and former Stone associate Randy Credico are also almost entirely redacted." McFarland and Credico's summaries include "markings that indicate redacted information relates to ongoing investigations." A chunk of the 412 pages of intervi