Epstein Secrets

Companies, 166 A.D.2d 223, 224 (1st Dept. 1990) Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., 532

y News filed a motion to quash, claiming that the tape recording is somehow protected by a journalist's privilege. In June 2010, the District Court (McKenna, J.,) rejected that argument, finding that, in view of its importance. the tape was properly discoverable despite the claim of journalist privilege

recording was somehow protected by a journalist's privilege. Jane Doe responded, and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (McKenna, J.) held a hearing and listened to the tape in camera. The district court then ruled that the tape was not protected by the journalist's privilege

. LLC 652 F. Supp. 2d 1252 (M.D. Fla. 2009) 12 Cooper Industries. Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group. Inc.,

nally required, or rooted in federal common law"); Persky v. Yeshiva Univ. No. 01 Civ. 4278 (LMM), 2002 WL 31769704, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2002) (McKenna. J.) ("This circuit has long recognized the existence of a qualified privilege for journalistic information. This privilege is based. at least in p

l, 443 F. Supp. 489 (ED. Pa. 1977) 7 Flores v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co., 178P.Id 1176, 1183 (Ariz. Ap

called Edwards' investigator and said, "My god, you've [got to] get this tape. [Epstein] talks about the girls." Fisten Aft at I 3. Similarly, Judge McKenna — who had the benefit of listening to the recording' — specifically ruled that the recording contains statements that are "of likely relevance to a

. LLC 652 F. Supp. 2d 1252 (M.D. Fla. 2009) 12 Cooper Industries. Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group. Inc.,

nally required, or rooted in federal common law"); Persky v. Yeshiva Univ. No. 01 Civ. 4278 (LMM), 2002 WL 31769704, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2002) (McKenna. J.) ("This circuit has long recognized the existence of a qualified privilege for journalistic information. This privilege is based. at least in p

MINI Coopers with an N12 or N14 engine, the MINI Cooper R56 (Cooper Hardtop), 2007-2010 model years, the

ed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1352 PRIOR HISTORY: rag Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (McKenna, J.) denying appellants' motion for leave to amend their complaint to add additional plaintiffs, the district court having found that the claims of

to subpoenas in which they have no interest (see 'Cooper v. Kopper, 74 AD3d 6 [2d Dept 2010] [courts shou

n application for recusal. 'In a separate unreported case Poe v. Epstein in which a young woman sued Epstein in connection with underage sex, Judge McKenna of the New York District Court Southern District of New York, found sufficient relevance to order the tape released, but the case was settled first

845345v) 3970112-000042 EFTA00596451 Flores v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 178 P.3d 1176 (Ariz. CI. App.

se in Opposition to Motion of Daily News, to Quash Subpoena), at 6-13) — the same exact waiver argument he makes here. The federal District Court (McKenna, J.) did not accept Edwards' waiver argument; but, instead, ruled that, since Epstein was known to be the source for the interview, he was a non- co

EFTA01655688 (02/25, Stancy), The Hill (02/25, Fields), NewsNation (02/25, Staff Writer), Newsweek (02/25, McFall), and Times Free Press (02/25, Cooper). Continued Reporting: Director Patel to Lead Both FBI and ATF, Pledges Constitutional Focus and Crime- Fighting Resolve Clearance Jobs (02/25, Suc

ht to help fund Mexican cartels. EFTA01655692 Karen Read Case: Defense Confirms It Paid Crash Experts Hired by FBI After Trial Mass Live (02/25, McKenna) reported that at a hearing on Tuesday, defense lawyers for Karen Read sought to downplay the extent of the communications they had with a pair of a