Epstein Secrets

v. Steinberg, 764 N.Y.S.2d 236 (App. Div. 2003)); Cooper v. Sony Records Int 'I,No. 00 Civ. 233 (RMB), 20

(internal quotation marks omitted); see also Feliciano v. U.S. Bank N.A., No. 13-CV-5555, 2014 WL 2945798, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. June 27, 2014) (same). The Second Circuit has explained that the type of situation -9- EFTA00802463 warranting equitable tolling is one "where a plaintiff could show that it would have be

ngs that she had told me. She told me he went to Cooper Union. He was a mathematical genius. That he had

ile his direct appeal as of right is pending, his death abates not only the appeal, but also proceedings had during the course of the prosecution. The Second Circuit incidentally has also held that when a criminal conviction abates upon the death of a defendant, any restitution ordered as a result of that convi

ngs that she had told me. She told me he went to Cooper Union. He was a mathematical genius. That he had

ile his direct appeal as of right is pending, his death abates not only the appeal, but also proceedings had during the course of the prosecution. The Second Circuit incidentally has also held that when a criminal conviction abates upon the death of a defendant, any restitution ordered as a result of that convi

ngs that she had told me. She told me he went to Cooper Union. He was a mathematical genius. That he had

ile his direct appeal as of right is pending, his death abates not only the appeal, but also proceedings had during the course of the prosecution. The Second Circuit incidentally has also held that when a criminal conviction abates upon the death of a defendant, any restitution ordered as a result of that convi

ngs that she had told me. She told me he went to Cooper Union. He was a mathematical genius. That he had

ile his direct appeal as of right is pending, his death abates not only the appeal, but also proceedings had during the course of the prosecution. The Second Circuit incidentally has also held that when a criminal conviction abates upon the death of a defendant, any restitution ordered as a result of that convi

ngs that she had told me. She told me he went to Cooper Union. He was a mathematical genius. That he had

ile his direct appeal as of right is pending, his death abates not only the appeal, but also proceedings had during the course of the prosecution. The Second Circuit incidentally has also held that when a criminal conviction abates upon the death of a defendant, any restitution ordered as a result of that convi

2020) (finding that depression did not impact the witness's "ability to accurately perceive or recall" relevant events); see also United States v. Cooper, No. 15-CR-152 (RMC), 2017 WL 11496709, at *1 (D.D.C. Jan. 27, 2017) (excluding diagnosis of major depressive disorder). Last, the Defense points t

ons, the Defense should be permitted to admit Dr. Hall's conclusion as to Alleged Victim 4's substance abuse Def. Br. at 12-13 (collecting cases). The Second Circuit instructs: It is, of course, within the proper scope of cross-examination to determine whether a witness was under the influence of drugs or narcot

ings that she had told me. She told me he went to Cooper Union. He was a mathematical genius. That he had

while his direct appeal as of right is pending, his death abates not only the appeal, but also proceedings had during the course of the prosecution. The Second Circuit incidentally has also held that when a criminal conviction abates upon the death of a defendant, any restitution ordered as a result of that convicti