Epstein Secrets

19 U.S. v. Sean Stewart, 15 Cr. 287 (JSR) (Enzer/Cooper) (USAO # 2015R001626): In the wake of a recent S

t a DHS facility. 11/18/19 U.S. v. Michael Avenatti (USAO # 2019R00279) (Podolsky/Boone/Sobelman) (J. Gardephe) (PC): Charges of extortion against Avenatti. 37 EFTA00095027 1/21/20 U.S. v. Edwards (USAO # 2018R00675) (Richenthal/Ravener) (J. Woods) (PC): Charges of unlawfully disseminating suspicio

NYC Department of Homeless Services police officer for engaging in excessive force against a homeless patient at a DHS facility. 11/18/19 U.S. v. Michael Avenatti (USAO # 2019R00279) (Podolsky/Boone/Sobelman) (J. Gardephe) (PC): Charges of extortion against Avenatti. 37 EFTA00095027 1/21/20 U.S. v. Edward

ed" to learn that plaintiff's successor counsel, Cooper & Kirk, had received from plaintiff's former coun

ial jurors, to incriminating evidence that the law has determined may not be used to support a conviction"), cited with approval in United States a Avenatti , (S1) 19 CR 373 PGG, 2020 WL 70952, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020). Based on these cases, the Court may make specific findings supporting the sealin

to the Protective Order. Doc.1071 at 4. The Court rejected Cooper & Kirk's suggestion that it properly was a recipient of the material: [W]hatever Cooper & Kirk's intentions in requesting and obtaining the Maxwell materials from Boies Schiller, the Maxwell Protective Order explicitly provides that (1

al jurors, to incriminating evidence that the law has determined may not be used to support a conviction"), cited with approval in United States v. Avenatti , (S1) 19 CR 373 PGG, 2020 WL 70952, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020). Based on these cases, the Court may make specific findings supporting the sealin