Epstein Secrets

me, David Boies used me to deflect and de-escalate the escalating accusations and investigations into Boies' and Lisa Bloom's behaviour towards the Weinstein rape victims and ongoing investigation as he was their client, and they used my anonymity for their personal use. It's in my grievance against the

ing by your close circle of friends I think not only do you need to publicly apologies the the Royal Family but explain your close friendship with the Harvey Weinstein who we know Boies is very close to etc. I want an explanation from you personally and your best mate Gayle why you have aided and abetted Epsteins

s, Bill Clinton, EFTA00144311 Bob Weinstein, Harvey Weinstein, Hunter Biden (seeming as HUNTER BIDEN

ase help us. Regards On Wednesday, 20 December 2023 at 22:30, wrote: Dick, please can you release Epsteins flight logs immediately now that Judge Preska has ruled in favour of revealing all information. Why are you delaying releasing all the Epatein flight logs? I'm especially intrigued between the

ts in another former client's case, serial rapist Harvey Weinstein but not for justice for another? Of c

of Boies or the US GOVERNMENT. Or have they always been around? Sex abuse survivors have already been down this road before with Boies and Co, when Harvey Weinstein's victims were silenced by Boies and co. In your and my own exhaustive investigation, I'm sure this will be uncovered in- depth. Then I, too, will sue

ome forward and put preassure on the judge?" On 17 October 2017, Brad responded, "We found and served G last week. So she is in. Did you ever meet Weinstein? Do you know anything about a relationship between Weinstein and Epstein? If so, how do we prove it? " 14 EFTA00145619 On Oct 17, 2017, I respon

grid, "I have two days, Sigrid!". On 6th AiS 2020, Sigrid responds, "That is texting a clip from an Order from the v. Dershowitz case that Judge Preska issued — (I am not counsel in that case, but she is the same Judge that is overseeing the unsealing process in the v. Maxwell case). There is a Pro

is Bill Clinton, Bob Weinstein, EFTA00144539 Harvey Weinstein, Hunter Biden (seeming as HUNTER BIDEN

me, David Boies used me to deflect and de-escalate the escalating accusations and investigations into Boies' and Lisa Bloom's behaviour towards the Weinstein rape victims and ongoing investigation as he was their client, and they used my anonymity for their personal use. It's in my grievance against the

hislaine Maxwell Bill Bar, Alex Acosta, Alan Dershowitz, David Boies, Dawn Shnieder Chante Davis Bill Clinton, Bob Weinstein, EFTA00144539 Harvey Weinstein, Hunter Biden (seeming as HUNTER BIDEN WAS A PAID EMPLOYEE OF BOIES SHILLER FLEXNER) Sigrid, Brad Edwards Stan Pottinger Paul Cassel Rupert M

ards EFTA00144511 On Wednesday, 20 December 2023 at 22:30, > wrote: Dick, please can you release Epsteins flight logs immediately now that Judge Preska has ruled in favour of revealing all information. Why are you delaying releasing all the Epatein flight logs? I'm especially intrigued between the

me, David Boies used me to deflect and de-escalate the escalating accusations and investigations into Boies' and Lisa Bloom's behaviour towards the Weinstein rape victims and ongoing investigation as he was their client, and they used my anonymity for their personal use. It's in my grievance against the

hislaine Maxwell Bill Bar, Alex Acosta, Alan Dershowitz, David Boies, Dawn Shnieder Chante Davis Bill Clinton, Bob Weinstein, EFTA00144454 Harvey Weinstein, Hunter Biden (seeming as HUNTER BIDEN WAS A PAID EMPLOYEE OF BOIES SHILLER FLEXNER) Sigrid, Brad Edwards Stan Pottinger Paul Cassel Rupert M

is Bill Clinton, Bob Weinstein, EFTA00144454 Harvey Weinstein, Hunter Biden (seeming as HUNTER BIDEN

ards EFTA00144426 On Wednesday, 20 December 2023 at 22:30, > wrote: Dick, please can you release Epsteins flight logs immediately now that Judge Preska has ruled in favour of revealing all information. Why are you delaying releasing all the Epatein flight logs? I'm especially intrigued between the

n re New York Times Co., 828 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1987), cited with approval in United States v. Longueuil, 567 Fed. App'x 13, 16 (2d Cir. 2014), Judge Weinstein denied the media's motion to unseal papers filed in connection with an unsuccessful defense motion to suppress evidence obtained by electronic surv

www.hmllaw.com [email protected] Re: Reconsideration of the Court's July 23 Ruling Giuffie v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: As counsel for Ms. Maxwell we write to request that the Court vindicate its Protective Order and punish its violation. Ms. Maxwell's two depositio

Ces2e.29-12,407413r3cliAlienDtidutinEl t310282 if663615/233/2174ig Plage aoat 9 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN July 29, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P C Ty Gee 150 East

In re New York Times Co., 828 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1987), cited with approval in United States v. Longueuil, 567 Fed. App'x 13,16 (2d Cir. 2014), Judge Weinstein denied the media's motion to unseal papers filed in connection with an unsuccessful defense motion to suppress evidence obtained by electronic surv

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1078 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 9 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN July 29, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, r.0 Ty Gee 150 East

www.hmtlaw.com [email protected] Re: Reconsideration of the Court's July 23 Ruling Giuffie v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: As counsel for Ms. Maxwell we write to request that the Court vindicate its Protective Order and punish its violation. Ms. Maxwell's two depositio

g litigation in the "broadest and weakest sense," the court nonetheless 5 &g g, Apicella v.McNeil Labs.. Inc. 66 F.R.D. 78, 82, 85 (E.D.N.Y. 1975) (Weinstein, J.) ("In exercising this authority," under Federal Rules 26 and 37, "the court must consider the possible necessity for the information and the co

g Petroleum Products standard to confidential materials): E Gallo Winery v. Encana Energy Servs.. Inc.. 33 Media L. Rep. 1413. 1414 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (Preska, J.) (applying petroleum Products standard to both confidential sources and confidential materials) (copy annexed as Ex. A to Carroll Reply Decl.);

g litigation in the "broadest and weakest sense," the court nonetheless 5 &g g, Apicella v.McNeil Labs.. Inc. 66 F.R.D. 78, 82, 85 (E.D.N.Y. 1975) (Weinstein, J.) ("In exercising this authority," under Federal Rules 26 and 37, "the court must consider the possible necessity for the information and the co

g Petroleum Products standard to confidential materials): E Gallo Winery v. Encana Energy Servs.. Inc.. 33 Media L. Rep. 1413. 1414 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (Preska, J.) (applying petroleum Products standard to both confidential sources and confidential materials) (copy annexed as Ex. A to Carroll Reply Decl.);

used me to deflect and de- escalate the escalating accusatio ns and investigati ons into Boies' and Lisa Bloom's behaviour towards the Weinstein rape victims and ongoing investigati on as he was their client, and they used my anonymity for their personal use. It's in my grievan

n Wednesday, 20 December 2023 at 22:30, EFTA00145832 corn wrote: Dick, please can you release Epsteins flight logs immediately now that Judge Preska has ruled in favour of revealing all information. Why are you delaying releasing all the Epatein flight logs? I'm especially intrigued between

Case 1 15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1078 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 9 HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN July 29, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Ty Gee 150 East

www.hmtlaw.com tgeefghmflaw.com Re: Reconsideration of the Court's July 23 Ruling Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: As counsel for Ms. Maxwell we write to request that the Court vindicate its Protective Order and punish its violation. Ms. Maxwell's two depositio

In reNew York Times Co., 828 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1987), cited with approval in United States v. Longueuil, 567 Fed. App'x 13,16 (2d Cir. 2014), Judge Weinstein denied the media's motion to unseal papers filed in connection with an unsuccessful defense motion to suppress evidence obtained by electronic surv